IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1075-d1656676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a Time-Lagged Effect Exist Between Landscape Pattern Changes and Giant Panda Density?

Author

Listed:
  • Qingxia Zhao

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Qifeng Zhu

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Jiqin Huang

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Yueduo Cui

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Yutai Liu

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Dong Chen

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

  • Xuelin Jin

    (Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China)

Abstract

Land use and land cover change (LULCC) can influence giant panda distributions by altering landscape structure and configuration. However, the spatial impacts and potential time lag effects of landscape pattern changes on giant pandas remain underexplored. In this study, we applied a random forest classification method to analyze LULCC in 1990, 2000, and 2010, alongside calculating a set of landscape metrics to assess changes in landscape fragmentation, connectivity, and diversity. Random forest regression models were then used to evaluate the spatial relationships between landscape metrics and giant panda density, with the aim of identifying whether a time lag effect exists. The results revealed the following: (1) The random forest classification achieved high land use classification accuracy. Forests remained the dominant land cover, occupying approximately 97% of the study area throughout the period, with only minor fluctuations observed among other land use types. (2) Landscape metrics indicated increasing landscape fragmentation, connectivity, and diversity. While increased landscape fragmentation can negatively impact giant panda habitat, improvements in landscape connectivity and diversity could mitigate these effects by preserving movement corridors and enhancing habitat accessibility. (3) The strongest correlations between giant panda density and landscape metrics were observed when the time points aligned. Landscape metrics from 2010 showed the highest correlation with the 4th NGPS (around 2010), and landscape metrics from 2000 had the highest correlation with the 3rd NGPS (around 2000). The results revealed that giant panda density responded most strongly to contemporary landscape pattern changes, suggesting an immediate response. However, correlations with earlier landscape metrics also suggest that a relatively weak time lag effect may be present. All landscape metrics were derived from remote sensing data, enabling scalable and repeatable GIS-based analysis. These findings highlight the utility of spatial landscape indicators for monitoring species distribution patterns and underscore the importance of maintaining and enhancing habitat connectivity within giant panda conservation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingxia Zhao & Qifeng Zhu & Jiqin Huang & Yueduo Cui & Yutai Liu & Dong Chen & Xuelin Jin, 2025. "Does a Time-Lagged Effect Exist Between Landscape Pattern Changes and Giant Panda Density?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1075-:d:1656676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1075-:d:1656676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.