IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1016-d1650993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desertification as a Social–Ecological Trap: How Does It Come About and What Are Namibian Freehold Farmers Doing About It?

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Grieger

    (ISOE—Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Altenhöferallee 1, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Katja Brinkmann

    (ISOE—Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Georg-Voigt-Straße 14, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Markus Rauchecker

    (ISOE—Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Georg-Voigt-Straße 14, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Stefan Liehr

    (ISOE—Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Georg-Voigt-Straße 14, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

Desertification, accompanied by the loss of perennial grasses and bush encroachment, affects more than 10% of the world’s drylands, thereby placing increasing pressure on rangelands and farmers’ livelihoods. In Namibia, rangeland desertification is exacerbated by external shocks such as droughts, market changes, and new regulatory frameworks that have led to profound social and ecological changes within this tightly coupled social–ecological system (SES). In this context, the interrelationship among system components, drivers, and external factors, as well as the impact of strategies to halt desertification, remain poorly understood. The present study employed a retrospective mixed-methods approach to investigate the drivers of desertification on Namibia’s freehold farms by applying the social–ecological trap (SET) concept. Our approach combined remote sensing methods with semi-structured interviews and a literature review. The aim was to decipher the underlying processes and self-reinforcing feedback loops and to identify associated changes in the social and ecological subsystem. Our results revealed that inadequate grass availability, coupled with income deficits, serves as a pivotal catalyst for rangeland desertification, perpetuating a self-reinforcing feedback loop. To avoid or mitigate the effects of ecological regime shifts and to help farmers escape the SET of desertification, it will be necessary to implement changes in the dominant feedback loops through long-term risk mitigation strategies, such as rangeland restoration measures, as well as on- and off-farm income diversification. These strategies will provide a foundation for subsequent research on effective long-term mitigation strategies to prevent further rangeland desertification and to secure the livelihoods of farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Grieger & Katja Brinkmann & Markus Rauchecker & Stefan Liehr, 2025. "Desertification as a Social–Ecological Trap: How Does It Come About and What Are Namibian Freehold Farmers Doing About It?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1016-:d:1650993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Luvuno & Reinette Biggs & Nicola Stevens & Karen Esler, 2018. "Woody Encroachment as a Social-Ecological Regime Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Glenn-Marie Lange & Jonathan Barnes & Daniel Motinga, 1998. "Cattle numbers, biomass, productivity and land degradation in the commercial farming sector of Namibia, 1915-95," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 555-572.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesper Stage, 2002. "Structural Shifts In Namibian Energy Use: An Input‐Output Approach," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 70(6), pages 1103-1125, September.
    2. Therezah Achieng & Kristine Maciejewski & Michelle Dyer & Reinette Biggs, 2020. "Using a Social-ecological Regime Shift Approach to Understand the Transition from Livestock to Game Farming in the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Ingrid Vigna & Angelo Besana & Elena Comino & Alessandro Pezzoli, 2021. "Application of the Socio-Ecological System Framework to Forest Fire Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Mahabile, M. & Lyne, Michael C. & Panin, A., 2005. "An empirical analysis of factors affecting the productivity of livestock in southern Botswana," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(01), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Reid, Hannah & Sahlen, Linda & Stage, Jesper & MacGregor, James, 2007. "The economic impact of climate change in Namibia. How climate change will affect the contribution of Namibia’s natural resources to its economy," Discussion Papers 37922, International Institute for Environment and Development, Environmental Economics Programme.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1016-:d:1650993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.