IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p734-d1623517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Heritage Risk Assessment Based on Explainable Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of the Ancient Tea Horse Road in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Bo Shu

    (School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yang Liu

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yang Wei

    (School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Huizhen Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

As the core carrier of historical and cultural identity, cultural heritage is facing multiple threats such as natural disasters, human activities and its own vulnerability. There is an increasing number of studies on cultural heritage risk assessment around the world, but the risk assessment of cultural heritage in China has not been fully explored. In this paper, the LightGBM model was used to quantitatively analyze the main influencing factors of cultural heritage risk along the Ancient Tea Horse Road in Sichuan, and spatial analysis was carried out by combining geographic information system (GIS) technology. In order to improve the interpretability of the assessment results, the SHAP method was introduced to systematically evaluate the contribution of each influencing factor to the risk of cultural heritage. This study identified seven major risk factors, including landslides, collapses, debris flows, earthquakes, soil erosion, urban road networks, and cultural heritage vulnerability, and constructed a risk assessment framework that comprehensively considers the vulnerability to natural and synthetic factors and the heritage itself. The results of the assessment divided the risk of cultural heritage sites into five levels: very low, low, medium, high and very high, and the results showed that 52.36% of the cultural heritage was classified as at medium and high risk and above, revealing the severe security situation faced by cultural heritage in the region and indicating the urgent need to take effective protective and management measures to deal with multiple risks and challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Zhang & Bo Shu & Yang Liu & Yang Wei & Huizhen Zhang, 2025. "Cultural Heritage Risk Assessment Based on Explainable Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of the Ancient Tea Horse Road in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:734-:d:1623517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Fatorić & Erin Seekamp, 2017. "Are cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change? A systematic literature review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 227-254, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Angela Rosa & Angela Santangelo & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Investigating the Integration of Cultural Heritage Disaster Risk Management into Urban Planning Tools. The Ravenna Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Etienne Quillet & Steve Plante & Louis-Etienne Pigeon, 2023. "Systematic literature review of social-ecological changes in fisheries systems," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(4), pages 617-628, December.
    4. Ionut Cristi Nicu & Knut Stalsberg & Lena Rubensdotter & Vibeke Vandrup Martens & Anne-Cathrine Flyen, 2020. "Coastal Erosion Affecting Cultural Heritage in Svalbard. A Case Study in Hiorthhamn (Adventfjorden)—An Abandoned Mining Settlement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Massimo Sargolini & Ilenia Pierantoni, 2019. "Climate Change Challenges to Existing Cultural Heritage Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, September.
    6. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Pérez-Hernández, Eva & Peña-Alonso, Carolina & Hernández-Calvento, Luis, 2020. "Assessing lost cultural heritage. A case study of the eastern coast of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria city (Spain)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Xiao, Xiao & Seekamp, Erin & van der Burg, Max Post & Eaton, Mitchell & Fatorić, Sandra & McCreary, Allie, 2019. "Optimizing historic preservation under climate change: Decision support for cultural resource adaptation planning in national parks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 379-389.
    9. Thirupathi Rao & Siti Indati Mustapa, 2020. "A Review of Climate Economic Models in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Armand Faganel, 2018. "Global Diversities in Safeguarding the Cultural Heritage," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    11. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Florian Klopfer & René Westerholt & Dietwald Gruehn, 2021. "Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & José Álvarez-García & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Amador Durán-Sánchez, 2021. "Scientific Mapping on the Impact of Climate Change on Cultural and Natural Heritage: A Systematic Scientometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Gül Aktürk & Hannah Fluck, 2022. "Vernacular Heritage as a Response to Climate: Lessons for Future Climate Resilience from Rize, Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2019. "Weather conditions and museum attendance: a case-study from Sicily," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 511-527, June.
    16. Kosanic, Aleksandra & Petzold, Jan, 2020. "A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    17. Fatorić, Sandra & Seekamp, Erin, 2017. "Evaluating a decision analytic approach to climate change adaptation of cultural resources along the Atlantic Coast of the United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 254-263.
    18. Sandra Fatorić & Erin Seekamp, 2017. "Securing the Future of Cultural Heritage by Identifying Barriers to and Strategizing Solutions for Preservation under Changing Climate Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Haisheng Hu, 2024. "Impact of climatic-meteorological conditions on Polish wooden cultural heritage: an example of world heritage sites featuring wooden churches near Krakow," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Ky Nam Nguyen & Sarah Baker, 2023. "Climate Change Impacts on UNESCO World Heritage-Listed Cultural Properties in the Asia–Pacific Region: A Systematic Review of State of Conservation Reports, 1979–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:734-:d:1623517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.