IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p702-d1620579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Environmental Variables into Geostatistical Interpolation: Enhancing Soil Mapping for the MEDALUS Model in Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Miletić

    (Department of Ecological Engineering for Soil and Water Resources Protection, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jelena Beloica

    (Department of Ecological Engineering for Soil and Water Resources Protection, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Predrag Miljković

    (Department of Ecological Engineering for Soil and Water Resources Protection, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Geostatistical methods are important in analyzing natural resources providing input data for complex mathematical models that address environmental processes and their spatial distribution. Ten interpolation methods and one empirical-based classification grounded in empirical knowledge, with a total of 929 soil samples, were used to create the most accurate spatial prediction maps for clay, sand, humus, and soil depth in Montenegro. These analyses serve as a preparatory phase and prioritize the practical application of the obtained results for the implementation and improvement of the MEDALUS model. This model, used to assess sensitivity to land degradation, effectively integrates into broader current and future research. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating auxiliary variables, such as topography, climate, and vegetation data, enhancing explanatory power and accuracy in delineating the environmental characteristics, ensuring better adaptability to the studied area. The results were validated by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and root mean square error (RMSE). For the clay, EBKRP (empirical Bayesian kriging regression prediction) achieved R 2 = 0.35 and RMSE = 6.95%, for the sand, it achieved R 2 = 0.34 and RMSE = 17.38%, for the humus, it achieved R 2 = 0.50 and RMSE = 3.80%, and for the soil depth, it achieved R 2 = 0.76 and RMSE = 5.36 cm. These results indicate that EBKRP is the optimal method for accurately mapping soil characteristics in future research in Montenegro.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Miletić & Jelena Beloica & Predrag Miljković, 2025. "Integrating Environmental Variables into Geostatistical Interpolation: Enhancing Soil Mapping for the MEDALUS Model in Montenegro," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:702-:d:1620579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edin SALKOVIĆ & Igor DJUROVIĆ & Mirko KNEŽEVIĆ & Vesna POPOVIĆ-BUGARIN & Ana TOPALOVIĆ, 2018. "Digitization and mapping of national legacy soil data of Montenegro," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 83-89.
    2. Jiajun Zhang & Junsheng Peng & Xingyi Chen & Xinyi Shi & Ziwei Feng & Yichen Meng & Wende Chen & Yingping Liu, 2024. "Comparative Study on Different Interpolation Methods and Source Analysis of Soil Toxic Element Pollution in Cangxi County, Guangyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Jesús Barrena-González & Joaquín Francisco Lavado Contador & Manuel Pulido Fernández, 2022. "Mapping Soil Properties at a Regional Scale: Assessing Deterministic vs. Geostatistical Interpolation Methods at Different Soil Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Li Gao & Mingjing Huang & Wuping Zhang & Lei Qiao & Guofang Wang & Xumeng Zhang, 2021. "Comparative Study on Spatial Digital Mapping Methods of Soil Nutrients Based on Different Geospatial Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Yasser M. Zakarya & Mohamed M. Metwaly & Georgios Koubouris, 2020. "Deciphering Soil Spatial Variability through Geostatistics and Interpolation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yujiao Chen & Zhengbo Luo, 2022. "Hedonic Pricing of Houses in Megacities Pre- and Post-COVID-19: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Jesús Barrena-González & Joaquín Francisco Lavado Contador & Manuel Pulido Fernández, 2022. "Mapping Soil Properties at a Regional Scale: Assessing Deterministic vs. Geostatistical Interpolation Methods at Different Soil Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Antonio Ganga & Mario Elia & Blaž Repe, 2023. "Applications of GIS and Remote Sensing in Soil Environment Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-2, September.
    4. Guannan Cui & Yanfeng Liu & Pengfei Wang & Xinyu Bai & Haitao Wang & Yiming Xu & Meiqiong Yang & Liming Dong, 2022. "Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Agricultural Land Use Non-Point Source Pollution in Typical Biofuel Ethanol Planting Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:702-:d:1620579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.