IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p529-d1604500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of Potential and Realized Ecosystem Services Based on Land Use Data in Northern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Torlarp Kamyo

    (Department of Agroforestry, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand)

  • Dokrak Marod

    (Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand)

  • Sura Pattanakiat

    (Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Nakhonpathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Lamthai Asanok

    (Department of Agroforestry, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand)

Abstract

Evaluating potential (PES) and realized (RES) ecosystem services can significantly improve the clarity and understanding of sustainable natural resource management practices. This study determined spatial distribution indices and assessed the economic value of both PES and RES in Northern Thailand. The geographic distribution and intensity of 17 ecological services of six land use categories (i.e., forests, agriculture, shrubland, urban land, water bodies, and barren land) were estimated for the distribution and unit values of PES and RES, by using the Co$ting Nature Model. Our results suggested that the PES and RES values were spatially consistent. The map showing the distribution of PES and RES values revealed high values in the cities of Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Lamphun, Lampang, Phitsanulok, and Nakhon Sawan. Nutrient cycling, soil formation, and water supply were identified as the top potential ecological services, while nutrient cycling, water supply, and soil formation were the most realized. The ecosystem service packages in Northern Thailand had a potential annual value of 36.31 billion USD per year. However, after adjusting for relative indices, the realized ecosystem services were valued at 13.44 billion USD per year, representing only one-third of the potential value. To manage resources effectively and make informed decisions, it is essential to comprehend the gap between possible and actual ecosystem services. This research underscores the financial worth of ecosystem services and emphasizes the significance of using them sustainably to enhance human well-being and conserve the environment in Northern Thailand.

Suggested Citation

  • Torlarp Kamyo & Dokrak Marod & Sura Pattanakiat & Lamthai Asanok, 2025. "Valuation of Potential and Realized Ecosystem Services Based on Land Use Data in Northern Thailand," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:529-:d:1604500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kreuter, Urs P. & Harris, Heather G. & Matlock, Marty D. & Lacey, Ronald E., 2001. "Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 333-346, December.
    2. Roshan Sharma & Bhagawat Rimal & Himlal Baral & Udo Nehren & Kiran Paudyal & Sunil Sharma & Sushila Rijal & Surendra Ranpal & Ram Prasad Acharya & Amer A. Alenazy & Prashid Kandel, 2019. "Impact of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services in a Tropical Forested Landscape," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Aynur Mamat & Ümüt Halik & Aihemaitijiang Rouzi, 2018. "Variations of Ecosystem Service Value in Response to Land-Use Change in the Kashgar Region, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Howarth, Richard B. & Farber, Stephen, 2002. "Accounting for the value of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 421-429, June.
    5. Sara Prybutok & Galen Newman & Kayode Atoba & Garett Sansom & Zhihan Tao, 2021. "Combining Co$ting Nature and Suitability Modeling to Identify High Flood Risk Areas in Need of Nature-Based Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Rimal, Bhagawat & Sharma, Roshan & Kunwar, Ripu & Keshtkar, Hamidreza & Stork, Nigel E. & Rijal, Sushila & Rahman, Syed Ajijur & Baral, Himlal, 2019. "Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Xin Gao & Juqin Shen & Weijun He & Fuhua Sun & Zhaofang Zhang & Xin Zhang & Chengcai Zhang & Yang Kong & Min An & Liang Yuan & Xiaocang Xu, 2019. "Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Establishment of Watershed Ecological Compensation Standards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-30, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srijana Shrestha & Khem Narayan Poudyal & Nawraj Bhattarai & Mohan B. Dangi & John J. Boland, 2022. "An Assessment of the Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Change on the Degradation of Ecosystem Service Values in Kathmandu Valley Using Remote Sensing and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Cheng He & Kangning Xiong & Yongkuan Chi & Shuzhen Song & Jinzhong Fang & Shuyu He, 2022. "Effects of Landscape Type Change on Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecological Assets in a Karst Plateau-Mountain Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Sekela Twisa & Mohamed Mwabumba & Mathew Kurian & Manfred F. Buchroithner, 2020. "Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Drinking Water Ecosystem Services in Wami River Basin, Tanzania," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Ping Zhang & Liang He & Xin Fan & Peishu Huo & Yunhui Liu & Tao Zhang & Ying Pan & Zhenrong Yu, 2015. "Ecosystem Service Value Assessment and Contribution Factor Analysis of Land Use Change in Miyun County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Zhenhua Chao & Zhanhuan Shang & Chengdong Fei & Ziyi Zhuang & Mengting Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Expansion in the Mountainous Hindu Kush Himalayas Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Aynur Mamat & Jianping Wang & Yuanxu Ma, 2020. "Impacts of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value of Mountain–Oasis–Desert Ecosystem: A Case Study of Kaidu–Kongque River Basin, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Lei Yang & Fenglian Liu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Value of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Raju Rai & Yili Zhang & Basanta Paudel & Bipin Kumar Acharya & Laxmi Basnet, 2018. "Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics and Assessing the Ecosystem Service Values in the Trans-Boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Sumarga, Elham & Hein, Lars & Edens, Bram & Suwarno, Aritta, 2015. "Mapping monetary values of ecosystem services in support of developing ecosystem accounts," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 71-83.
    10. Nekane Castillo-Eguskitza & María F. Schmitz & Miren Onaindia & Alejandro J. Rescia, 2019. "Linking Biophysical and Economic Assessments of Ecosystem Services for a Social–Ecological Approach to Conservation Planning: Application in a Biosphere Reserve (Biscay, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Pham, Kien T. & Lin, Tang-Huang, 2023. "Effects of urbanisation on ecosystem service values: A case study of Nha Trang, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Mohan Kumar Rai & Basanta Paudel & Yili Zhang & Pashupati Nepal & Narendra Raj Khanal & Linshan Liu & Raju Rai, 2023. "Appraisal of Empirical Studies on Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services in Nepal Himalaya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Subham Mukherjee & Pradip Kumar Sikdar & Sukdeb Pal & Brigitta Schütt, 2021. "Assessment of Environmental Water Security of an Asian Deltaic Megacity and Its Peri-Urban Wetland Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-32, March.
    15. Jinxing Hu & Guojie Ma & Chaohai Shen & Xiaolan Zhou, 2022. "Impact of Urbanization through High-Speed Rail on Regional Development with the Interaction of Socioeconomic Factors: A View of Regional Industrial Structure," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Meixler, Marcia S., 2017. "Assessment of Hurricane Sandy damage and resulting loss in ecosystem services in a coastal-urban setting," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 28-46.
    17. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    18. Amirnejad, Hamid & Khalilian, Sadegh & Assareh, Mohammad H. & Ahmadian, Majid, 2006. "Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 665-675, July.
    19. Xiaoyu Li & Shudan Gong & Qingdong Shi & Yuan Fang, 2023. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Jens Abildtrup & Anne Stenger, 2022. "Report on valuation methods," Working Papers hal-04068881, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:529-:d:1604500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.