IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2039-d1769729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Multidimensional Visual Perception of Urban Riverfront Street Environments: A Framework Using Street View Images, Deep Learning and Eye-Tracking

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Xiong

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Yifan Wu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Miaomiao Ma

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Shanrui Yang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Junxiang Zhang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Qinghai Zhang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Haiyue Ye

    (School of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210036, China)

  • Yuanke Hu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

Urban waterfront areas (UWAs), which are essential natural resources and highly perceived public areas in cities, play a crucial role in improving the quality of the urban environment. While numerous studies have delved into the visual perception of urban environments, little attention has been paid to understanding how the visual perception of urban riverfront streets (URSs) differs with various aspects within their unique spatial environment. This study took the Gusu District in Suzhou, China, as a case study, applying deep learning to street-view images to identify urban riverside landscape elements and evaluate their visual attention, aesthetic preference, and distinctiveness through eye-tracking technology and questionnaires. Subsequently, a multidimensional assessment was conducted to analyze how landscape elements influence visual perception in the urban riverfront street. This study concludes that (1) riverfront streets in the Gusu District present balanced visual attention, with high aesthetic preference but limited distinctiveness, and only a few roads in the ancient city score highly for distinctiveness. (2) Greenery, traditional-style buildings, water, and riverfronts positively impact visual perception, while buildings have a negative impact, and backgrounds such as the sky and roads exhibit minimal influence. This study validated the scientific accuracy, appropriateness, and precision of assessments of visual attention, aesthetics, and distinctiveness to quantitatively evaluate the multidimensional human perception of URSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Xiong & Yifan Wu & Miaomiao Ma & Shanrui Yang & Junxiang Zhang & Qinghai Zhang & Haiyue Ye & Yuanke Hu, 2025. "Exploring the Multidimensional Visual Perception of Urban Riverfront Street Environments: A Framework Using Street View Images, Deep Learning and Eye-Tracking," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2039-:d:1769729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Wu & Jingwen Li & Yue Ma, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Potential and Actual of Urban Waterfront Spaces in Wuhan Based on Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Lucia Filova & Jiri Vojar & Kamila Svobodova & Petr Sklenicka, 2015. "The effect of landscape type and landscape elements on public visual preferences: ways to use knowledge in the context of landscape planning," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 2037-2055, November.
    3. Xin Jiang & Xin Li & Mingrui Wang & Xi Zhang & Wenhai Zhang & Yongjun Li & Xin Cong & Qinghai Zhang, 2025. "Multidimensional Visual Preferences and Sustainable Management of Heritage Canal Waterfront Landscape Based on Panoramic Image Interpretation," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Yue Chen & Qikang Zhong & Bo Li, 2023. "Positive or Negative Viewpoint Determines the Overall Scenic Beauty of a Scene: A Landscape Perception Evaluation Based on a Panoramic View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Chang Li & Xiaohui Huang, 2022. "Differences in Visual Attraction between Historical Garden and Urban Park Walking Scenes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Long & Li, Yixin & Cheng, Jialin & Qin, Yu & Shen, Guoqiang & Li, Bin & Yang, Huajie & Li, Sihong, 2023. "Understanding the aesthetic perceptions and image impressions experienced by tourists walking along tourism trails through continuous cityscapes in Macau," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Ao Du & Weihua Xu & Yi Xiao & Tong Cui & Tianyu Song & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2020. "Evaluation of Prioritized Natural Landscape Conservation Areas for National Park Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Xianlun Tian & Guohui Li & Ming Zhu, 2024. "View Selection of Safety Managers Affects Their Ability to Evaluate Safety Level of Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Teisl, Mario F. & Noblet, Caroline L. & Corey, Richard R. & Giudice, Nicholas A., 2018. "Seeing clearly in a virtual reality: Tourist reactions to an offshore wind project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 601-611.
    5. Jing Wu & Changlong Ling & Xinzhuo Li, 2019. "Study on the Accessibility and Recreational Development Potential of Lakeside Areas Based on Bike-Sharing Big Data Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Xulin Huang & Chenping Han & Mingkang Ma, 2022. "Visual preferences for outdoor space along commercial pedestrian streets under the influence of plant characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Rust, Niki A. & Rehackova, Lucia & Naab, Francis & Abrams, Amber & Hughes, Courtney & Merkle, Bethann Garramon & Clark, Beth & Tindale, Sophie, 2021. "What does the UK public want farmland to look like?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Jiaying Shi & Tsuyoshi Honjo & Kaixuan Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2020. "Using Virtual Reality to Assess Landscape: A Comparative Study Between On-Site Survey and Virtual Reality of Aesthetic Preference and Landscape Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Tao Gu & Chenping Han & Mengmeng Zhao & Lin Zhang & Zhongju Yang & Jian Zhang, 2024. "Is there any difference between the owners and the public in their visual impact assessments?——A case study of the front garden of multi-storey residential buildings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Jing Wu & Xirui Chen & Shulin Chen, 2019. "Temporal Characteristics of Waterfronts in Wuhan City and People’s Behavioral Preferences Based on Social Media Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-37, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2039-:d:1769729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.