IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p791-d1408020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Multifunctional Land Management in Abandoned Rural Areas: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Lankauskienė

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development, A. Vivulskio St. 4A-13, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development, A. Vivulskio St. 4A-13, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Rimantas Micka

    (Sun Circle Camping, Misgiriai St. 6, Judrėnai Eldership, 96291 Klaipėda District, Lithuania)

Abstract

The issue of the future of abandoned agricultural land has become a prominent topic of discussion in contemporary scientific research and political discourses, especially considering the unique contribution of new-generation entrepreneurs to innovations in rural areas. The research increasingly provides evidence of how they serve as founders and catalysts of unconventional and often audacious ideas that ultimately transform abandoned areas into successful sustainable innovative business models with restored multifunctional land use. The main aim of this article is to disclose the potential of innovative business models, developed by new-generation entrepreneurs, for sustainable multifunctional land management in abandoned rural places, through the example of the “Sun Circle Camping” initiative in Lithuania. A qualitative research methodology was applied to perform an in-depth case study of a successful business model innovation for sustainable multifunctional land management in an abandoned rural area of Lithuania. The research results demonstrate how the smartly restored multifunctional distribution of abandoned land might generate durable land management practices, fulfilling the environmental, socio-cultural, and economic pillars of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Lankauskienė & Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė & Rimantas Micka, 2024. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Multifunctional Land Management in Abandoned Rural Areas: A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:791-:d:1408020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongjun Guan & Zhen Zhang & Aiwu Zhao & Jinyuan Jia & Shuang Guan, 2019. "Research on Innovation Behavior and Performance of New Generation Entrepreneur Based on Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Reti, Kinga-Olga, 2019. "My land is my food: Exploring social function of large land deals using food security–land deals relation in five Eastern European countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 729-741.
    3. Pazúr, Robert & Lieskovský, Juraj & Bürgi, Matthias & Müller, Daniel & Lieskovský, Tibor & Zhang, Zhen & Prischchepov, Alexander V., 2020. "Abandonment and recultivation of agricultural lands in Slovakia: Patterns and determinants from the past to the future," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(9).
    4. Cathy Yang Liu & Lin Ye & Bo Feng, 2019. "Migrant entrepreneurship in China: entrepreneurial transition and firm performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 681-696, March.
    5. Melgar-Melgar, Rigo E. & Hall, Charles A.S., 2020. "Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: The biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lara Agostini & Federico Caviggioli & Francesco Galati & Barbara Bigliardi, 2020. "A social perspective of knowledge-based innovation: mobility and agglomeration. Introduction to the special section," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1309-1323, October.
    2. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Cropland Abandonment and Influencing Factors in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Muhammad Akmal & Khawaja Khalid Mehmood, 2022. "The Influence Of Person Job Fit On Innovative Work Behavior Through Intrinsic Motivation And Creative Self-Efficacy," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(2), pages 331-341.
    4. Christos Makriyannis, 2023. "How the Biophysical Paradigm Impedes the Scientific Advancement of Ecological Economics: A Transdisciplinary Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Singh, Simron J & Talwar, Simran & Shenoy, Megha, 2021. "Why Socio-metabolic Studies are Central to Ecological Economics," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 4(02), July.
    6. Salvador Peniche Camps & Charles A. S. Hall & Kent Klitgaard, 2020. "Biophysical Economics for Policy and Teaching: Mexico as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Zecca, Francesco & D’Errico, Marco, 2021. "Food security and land use: The Ethiopian case," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 23(2), July.
    8. Huan Yang & Xinning Zhang, 2023. "Persistence of culture: how the entrepreneurial culture of origin contributes to migrant entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1179-1204, October.
    9. Lundgren, Jakob, 2022. "Unity through disunity: Strengths, values, and tensions in the disciplinary discourse of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Kaitlin Kish, 2020. "Paying Attention: Big Data and Social Advertising as Barriers to Ecological Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Affek, Andrzej N. & Jabs-Sobocińska, Zofia & Wolski, Jacek & Radeloff, Volker C., 2023. "Pockets of persistence of agricultural land use during the socioeconomic shock of forced post-WWII displacements in the Carpathians," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Yong Sun & Hongjun Jiang & Xiaoli Zhu, 2024. "Drivers, Constraints, and Policy Regulation Strategies for the Abandonment of Farmland: Insights from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Wun-Jheng Wu & Pei-Ing Wu & Je-Liang Liou, 2021. "Boon or Bane: Effect of Adjacent YIMBY or NIMBY Facilities on the Benefit Evaluation of Open Spaces or Cropland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Dalia Streimikiene & Asta Mikalauskiene, 2023. "Assessment of Agricultural Sustainability: Case Study of Baltic States," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 17(2), June.
    15. Farley, Joshua & Melgar, Rigo E.M. & Hasan Ansari, Danish & Burke, Matthew J. & Danielsen, Julia & Egler, Megan & Makombore, Lizah & Neira, Juliana & Poudel, Shashank & Sellers, Shaun & Smolyar, Nina , 2024. "Rethinking ecosystem services from the anthropocene to the Ecozoic: Nature’s benefits to the biotic community," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Ping Zhang & Xin Wei & Guirong Mao, 2024. "Cultural diversity, social integration, and migrant entrepreneurship—evidence from the China migrants dynamic survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1135-1155, March.
    17. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "From scythe to smartphone: Rural transformation in Romania evidenced by the perception of rural land and population," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2021. "Education and migrant entrepreneurship in urban China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 506-529.
    19. Luciano Celi, 2021. "Deriving EROI for Thirty Large Oil Companies Using the CO2 Proxy from 1999 to 2018," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Lin Xiu & Morley Gunderson, 2021. "Does an Entrepreneurial Career Pay for Women in China?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 167-190, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:791-:d:1408020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.