IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p750-d1403427.html

An Assessment of Landscape Perception Using a Normalised Naturalness Index in the Greater Seoul Area

Author

Listed:
  • Doeun Kim

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, #82, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea)

  • Yonghoon Son

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, #82, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study analysed the greater Seoul area (GSA) in terms of naturalness, a representative indicator of natural scenic beauty, and created an assessment map, shifting from a traditional urban development perspective to a landscape perspective. It also developed a “normalised naturalness index” by combining the results of the expert metric score with the Hemeroby index, which was used as a naturalness assessment representative item. Then, it interpreted the naturalness status of the GSA landscape characteristics. As a result, the landscape of the GSA demonstrates the following five characteristics: First, the central business districts in the capital city of Seoul are densely developed areas with a very high degree of human intervention. Second, the satellite cities built to solve Seoul’s housing and logistics problems are rated as “a little less, but still heavily humanised” as a landscape characteristic. These areas are becoming increasingly humanised. Also, it is worth noting that the third characteristic, regarding moderate landscape areas, has a distinctly different meaning for areas outside of the city boundary, as well as those within the city boundary. Although these areas are in the same statistical category, they have two different meanings: one is the area where the average values converged on “moderate” by virtue of urban forests near the city centre, and the other is the area outside of Seoul that has a Hemeroby value of 0.5–0.6, which refers to open spaces such as agricultural lands, wetlands, or coastal areas. Fourth, suburban forests are reserved with legal restrictions to curb excessive urban sprawl, as well as parts of the demilitarised zone along the border areas of North and South Koreas. The last landscape characteristic is illustrated in the scenic area of the eastern woodlands. The normalised landscape naturalness index developed through this study provides an overall understanding of the environmental state of the GSA. Future research may build on the results of this study to refine methods for assessing public perceptions of naturalness.

Suggested Citation

  • Doeun Kim & Yonghoon Son, 2024. "An Assessment of Landscape Perception Using a Normalised Naturalness Index in the Greater Seoul Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:750-:d:1403427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermes, Johannes & Albert, Christian & von Haaren, Christina, 2018. "Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 296-307.
    2. Tao Wu & Peipei Zha & Mengjie Yu & Guojun Jiang & Jianzhen Zhang & Qinglong You & Xuefeng Xie, 2021. "Landscape Pattern Evolution and Its Response to Human Disturbance in a Newly Metropolitan Area: A Case Study in Jin-Yi Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Yonglong Lu & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Martin Visbeck & Anne-Sophie Stevance, 2015. "Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7548), pages 432-433, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nastasia Lineva & Roman Gorbunov & Ekaterina Kashirina & Tatiana Gorbunova & Polina Drygval & Cam Nhung Pham & Andrey Kuznetsov & Svetlana Kuznetsova & Dang Hoi Nguyen & Vu Anh Tu Dinh & Trung Dung Ng, 2025. "Landscape Dynamics of Cat Tien National Park and the Ma Da Forest Within the Dong Nai Biosphere Reserve, Socialist Republic of Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Xiao Xiao & Yue Cheng & Yuling Zhang, 2024. "Sustainable Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of the Impact of Policy Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Xiaojia Liu & Xi Chen & Yan Huang & Weihong Wang & Mingkan Zhang & Yang Jin, 2023. "Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Shannon L. Sibbald & Nicole Haggerty, 2019. "Integrating Business and Medical Pedagogy to Accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 92-101, March.
    5. Hermes, Johannes & von Haaren, Christina & Schmücker, Dirk & Albert, Christian, 2021. "Nature-based recreation in Germany: Insights into volume and economic significance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Zhi-Jiang Liu & Vera Snezhko & Anastasia Kurilova, 2022. "International legal instruments for stimulating green building and construction business: Russian case study," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 157-175, March.
    7. Luca Coscieme & Caroline A. Ochieng & Charles Spillane & Ian Donohue, 2023. "Measuring policy coherence on global access to clean energy between European countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Sponagel, Christian & Bendel, Daniela & Angenendt, Elisabeth & Weber, Tobias Karl David & Gayler, Sebastian & Streck, Thilo & Bahrs, Enno, 2022. "Integrated assessment of regional approaches for biodiversity offsetting in urban-rural areas – A future based case study from Germany using arable land as an example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Stella D. Juventia & Sarah K. Jones & Marie-Angélique Laporte & Roseline Remans & Chiara Villani & Natalia Estrada-Carmona, 2020. "Text Mining National Commitments towards Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Shijia Zhang & Xiaojuan Cao, 2025. "The Impact of Industrial Land Misallocation on Sustainable Urban Development: Mechanisms and Spatial Spillover Effects," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Jahar Bhowmik & Raaj Kishore Biswas & Nurjahan Ananna, 2020. "Women’s education and coverage of skilled birth attendance: An assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 in the South and Southeast Asian Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Lehmann, Paul & Tafarte, Philip, 2023. "The opportunity costs of environmental exclusion zones for renewable energy deployment," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2023, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    14. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Shuaifei Duan & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Han, 2024. "Identifying Potential National Park Locations Based on Landscape Aesthetic Quality in the Hengduan Mountains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Nariê Rinke Dias de Souza & Alexandre Souza & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Thayse Aparecida Dourado Hernandes & Otávio Cavalett, 2022. "Addressing the contributions of electricity from biomass in Brazil in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals using life cycle assessment methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 980-995, June.
    18. Ebenezer Agbozo, 2018. "The Role Of Data-Driven E-Government In Realizing The Sustainable Development Goals In Developing Economies," Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, Romanian-American University, vol. 12(1), pages 70-76, May.
    19. Gretchen Vengerova & Isaac Lipsky & Gwyneth A. Hutchinson & Nils J. H. Averesch & Aaron J. Berliner, 2024. "Space bioprocess engineering as a potential catalyst for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 238-246, March.
    20. Amy R. Lewis & Simon Willcock & Ana Casas & Beata Kupiec-Teahan & José Mendoza Sanchez & Fiona Anciano & Dani J. Barrington & Mmeli Dube & Paul Hutchings & Caroline Karani & Arturo Llaxacondor & Helle, 2025. "Realities of using self-administered smartphone surveys to solve sustainability challenges," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:750-:d:1403427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.