IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p525-d1376438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for Deer-Hunting Management at the Local and Regional Scales: Reconciling Economic, Social and Ecological Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudio Bicho

    (Department of Landscape, Environment and Planning, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Évora, Colégio Luís Verney, Rua Romão Ramalho, nº 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Rui Machado

    (CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Mitra Pole, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
    IIFA—Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Palácio do Vimioso, Largo Marquês de Marialva, Apart. 94, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal)

  • Russell Alpizar-Jara

    (IIFA—Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Palácio do Vimioso, Largo Marquês de Marialva, Apart. 94, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal
    CIMA—Research Center in Mathematics and Applications, Department of Mathematics, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Évora Pole, Colégio Luís Verney, Rua Romão Ramalho, nº 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Pedro Santos

    (Department of Landscape, Environment and Planning, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Évora, Colégio Luís Verney, Rua Romão Ramalho, nº 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Mitra Pole, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
    IIFA—Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Palácio do Vimioso, Largo Marquês de Marialva, Apart. 94, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal)

Abstract

Game species with home ranges exceeding the area of the management units may entail conflicts over hunting rights and cause damage to crops and forest stands in surrounding areas. This is currently the case in the Mendro Mountain Range (Portugal), inhabited by free-ranging red ( Cervus elaphus ) and fallow deer ( Dama dama ) populations. This study’s primary goal was to uncover the processes underlying these tensions and identify solutions to overcome them, thus reconciling the economic, social, and ecological functions of hunting. We analyzed data from three different sources of information regarding the surveyed management units: biophysical and anthropical spatial data collected using a GIS; typology, whether fenced, area and game bag results, data provided by a public institute; crop and forest damage locations reported by game managers. Approximately half of the surveyed open management units reported damage. We found no relationship between damage and game bag results, regardless of the typology and habitat quality index. To address this disconnection between the negative and positive values associated with deer locally, we proposed habitat management solutions. It is of chief importance to keep valuable crops apart from deer’s refuge cover, such as bushy areas, to minimize damage in management units where deer hunting is a subsidiary activity. Conversely, in management units where deer hunting is of significant economic importance, the food and refuge cover should be closely interspersed to increase the management unit’s carrying capacity. To improve the efficacy of measures such as this at a regional scale, as in the Mendro Mountain Range, we recommend implementing a so-called Global Management Plan. In Portuguese law, this governance instrument applies to the entire biologic unit where the deer populations occur, thus implying arrangements between the involved stakeholders and multiple other concerned institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudio Bicho & Rui Machado & Russell Alpizar-Jara & Pedro Santos, 2024. "Planning for Deer-Hunting Management at the Local and Regional Scales: Reconciling Economic, Social and Ecological Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:525-:d:1376438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anke Fischer & Camilla Sandström & Miguel Delibes-Mateos & Beatriz Arroyo & Degu Tadie & Deborah Randall & Fetene Hailu & Asanterabi Lowassa & Maurus Msuha & Vesna Kereži & Slaven Reljić & John Linnel, 2013. "On the multifunctionality of hunting -- an institutional analysis of eight cases from Europe and Africa," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 531-552, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgia Raftogianni & Vasileios J. Kontsiotis & Vasilios Liordos, 2022. "Wildlife Knowledge and Attitudes toward Hunting: A Comparative Hunter–Non-Hunter Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Živojinović, I. & Weiss, G. & Wilding, M. & Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A., 2020. "Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Ernst-August Nuppenau, 2018. "Eco-System Services in Agrarian Value Chains: Value Detection of Bio-Diversity as Public Good Provision, Problems, and Institutional Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Stryamets, Nataliya & Elbakidze, Marine & Chamberlain, James & Angelstam, Per, 2020. "Governance of non-wood forest products in Russia and Ukraine: Institutional rules, stakeholder arrangements, and decision-making processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Bowditch, Euan A.D. & McMorran, Rob & Bryce, Rosalind & Smith, Melanie, 2019. "Perception and partnership: Developing forest resilience on private estates," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 110-122.
    6. Ratna C. Purwestri & Miroslav Hájek & Miroslava Šodková & Vilém Jarský, 2020. "How Are Wood and Non-Wood Forest Products Utilized in the Czech Republic? A Preliminary Assessment of a Nationwide Survey on the Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Eastwood, Antonia & Fischer, Anke & Hague, Alice & Brown, Katrina, 2022. "A cup of tea? – The role of social relationships, networks and learning in land managers’ adaptations to policy change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Emily J. Potratz & Robert D. Holt & Joel S. Brown, 2024. "Ecology of Fear: Acclimation and Adaptations to Hunting by Humans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:525-:d:1376438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.