IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p522-d1375660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison and Evaluation of Five Global Land Cover Products on the Tibetan Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Yongjie Pan

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid Regions, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Danyun Wang

    (Tianjin Meteorological Disaster Defense Technology Centre, Tianjin 300074, China
    Plateau Atmosphere and Environment Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610225, China)

  • Xia Li

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid Regions, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yong Liu

    (Tianjin Meteorological Disaster Defense Technology Centre, Tianjin 300074, China)

  • He Huang

    (Tianjin Climate Center, Tianjin 300074, China)

Abstract

The Tibetan Plateau (TP) region contains maximal alpine grassland ecology at the mid-latitudes. This region is also recognized as an ecologically fragile and sensitive area under the effects of global warming. Regional climate modeling and ecosystem research depend on accurate land cover (LC) information. In order to obtain accurate LC information over the TP, the reliability and precision of five moderate/high-resolution LC products (MCD12Q1, C3S-LC, GlobeLand30, GLC_FCS30, and ESA2020 in 2020) were analyzed and evaluated in this study. The different LC products were compared with each other in terms of areal/spatial consistency and assessed with four reference sample datasets (Geo-Wiki, GLCVSS, GOFC-GOLD, and USGS) using the confusion matrix method for accuracy evaluation over the TP. Based on the paired comparison of these five LC datasets, all five LC products show that grass is the major land cover type on the TP, but the range of grass coverage identified by the different products varies noticeably, from 43.35% to 65.49%. The fully consistent spatial regions account for 43.72% of the entire region of the TP, while, in the transition area between grass and bare soil, there is still a large area of medium-to-low consistency. In addition, a comparison of LC datasets using integrated reference datasets shows that the overall accuracies of MCD12Q1, C3S-LC, GlobeLand30, GLC_FCS30, and ESA2020 are 54.29%, 49.32%, 53.03%, 53.73%, and 60.11%, respectively. The producer accuracy of the five products is highest for grass, while glaciers have the most reliable and accurate characteristics among all LC products for users. These findings provide valuable insights for the selection of rational and appropriate LC datasets for studying land-atmosphere interactions and promoting ecological preservation in the TP.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongjie Pan & Danyun Wang & Xia Li & Yong Liu & He Huang, 2024. "Comparison and Evaluation of Five Global Land Cover Products on the Tibetan Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:522-:d:1375660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:522-:d:1375660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.