IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p492-d1373219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Sequestration Dynamics in Peri-Urban Forests: Comparing Secondary Succession and Mature Stands under Varied Forest Management Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Cosmin Ion Braga

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Stefan Petrea

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania
    Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, “Transilvania” University of Brașov, Șirul Beethoven 1, 500123 Brașov, Romania)

  • Gheorghe Raul Radu

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Alexandru Bogdan Cucu

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Tibor Serban

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Alexandru Zaharia

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Stefan Leca

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 128 Eroilor Boulevard, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of silvicultural and land-use management practices on carbon sequestration in peri-urban forest ecosystems, with a particular focus on human-induced carbon dynamics. The study area’s complex profile spans from a compact native forest to varying degrees of fragmentation. This included areas undergoing secondary succession forest without silvicultural interventions (No-SI) alongside sites subjected to high-intensity (High-SI) and low-intensity silvicultural interventions (Low-SI). The research assessed carbon stocks and sequestration in different carbon pools (living biomass, dead organic matter and soil) using field data, allometric equations and laboratory analysis. Findings reveal a significant correlation between the intensity of anthropogenic interventions and variations in carbon stocks. The CASMOFOR model facilitated the reconstruction of carbon stock and carbon-stock change dynamics over four decades (1980–2022), showing disparities in carbon storage capabilities linked to the structural characteristics of the sites. The Low-SI site had the highest carbon stock in all carbon pools (378 tonnes C ha −1 ), which is more than double compared to High-SI (161 tonnes C ha −1 ) or No-SI sites (134 tonnes C ha −1 ). However, the secondary succession forest (No-SI) demonstrated the highest annual carbon stock change (4.4 tonnes C ha −1 year −1 ), two times higher than the Low-SI mature stand (2.2 tonnes C ha −1 year −1 ), emphasising the resilience of forest ecosystems to recover and sustain carbon sequestration capacities after harvesting if forest land use remains unchanged. The study underscores the significant importance of anthropogenic interventions on carbon dynamics, especially for living tree biomass, which has consequences in enhancing carbon sequestration and contributing to emission reduction targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosmin Ion Braga & Stefan Petrea & Gheorghe Raul Radu & Alexandru Bogdan Cucu & Tibor Serban & Alexandru Zaharia & Stefan Leca, 2024. "Carbon Sequestration Dynamics in Peri-Urban Forests: Comparing Secondary Succession and Mature Stands under Varied Forest Management Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:492-:d:1373219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonel J.R. Nunes & Catarina I.R. Meireles & Carlos J. Pinto Gomes & Nuno M.C. Almeida Ribeiro, 2019. "Forest Management and Climate Change Mitigation: A Review on Carbon Cycle Flow Models for the Sustainability of Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yingying & Chen, Sha & Jiang, Kejun & Kaghembega, Wendkuuni Steve-Harold, 2022. "The gaps and pathways to carbon neutrality for different type cities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Adam Kaliszewski & Marek Jabłoński, 2022. "Is It Possible for Poland to Achieve the Policy Goal of 33% Forest Cover by Mid-Century?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Yingchang Li & Mingyang Li & Yuehui Wang, 2022. "Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation and Response to Climate Change Based on Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:492-:d:1373219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.