IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p491-d1372828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Sustainable Development Goals and Land Administration: The Role of the ISO 19152 Land Administration Domain Model in SDG Indicator Formalization

Author

Listed:
  • Mengying Chen

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Peter Van Oosterom

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Eftychia Kalogianni

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Paula Dijkstra

    (Kadaster, The Netherlands Cadastre, Land Registry and Mapping Agency, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Christiaan Lemmen

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Hallenweg 8, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This study illustrates the linkages between the ISO’s Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) and the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs), highlighting the role of the LADM in promoting effective land administration suitable for efficient computation of land/water (space)-related SDG indicators. The main contribution of this study is the formalization of SDG indicators by using the ISO standard LADM. This paper proposes several SDG-indicator-related extensions to the multi-part LADM standard that is currently under revision. These extensions encompass the introduction of new procedures for calculating indicators, the integration of blueprints for external classes to fulfil additional information needs and the design of interface classes for presenting indicator values across specific countries and reporting years. In an innovative approach, this paper introduces the Four-Step Method—a powerful framework designed to formalize SDG indicators within the LADM framework. Detailed attention is devoted to specific indicators, including 1.4.2 (secure land rights), 5.a.1 (women’s agricultural land rights), 14.5.1 (protected marine areas) and 11.5.2 (valuation as a basis for direct economic loss). In short, the Four-Step Method is pivotal in eliminating ambiguities, enhancing the efficiency of indicator computation and securing more accurate indicator values that more truly reflect the progress towards SDG realization. This approach is also expected to work with other (ISO) standards for other SDG indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengying Chen & Peter Van Oosterom & Eftychia Kalogianni & Paula Dijkstra & Christiaan Lemmen, 2024. "Bridging Sustainable Development Goals and Land Administration: The Role of the ISO 19152 Land Administration Domain Model in SDG Indicator Formalization," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:491-:d:1372828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "Women’s access to land and the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Requirements, modelling and assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Unger, Eva-Maria & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Lemmen, Christiaan & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2021. "LADM for sustainable development: An exploratory study on the application of domain-specific data models to support the SDGs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergei G. Vagin & Elena I. Kostyukova & Natalia E. Spiridonova & Tatiana M. Vorozheykina, 2022. "Financial Risk Management Based on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Interests of Sustainable Development," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Ho, Serene & Tanyag, Maria & Scalise, Elisa, 2023. "Women’s land rights, gendered epistemic tensions, and the need for a feminist approach to land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "Women’s access to land and the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Requirements, modelling and assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:491-:d:1372828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.