IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2232-d1548237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Land-Cover Change and Urbanization Impact on Riparian Zones in South Carolina: A Decade of Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjeev Sharma

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, College of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)

  • Puskar Khanal

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, College of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)

Abstract

This study investigates land-cover changes along riparian zones in South Carolina, focusing on intermittent and perennial streams to assess the impact of urbanization, forest loss, and impervious surface expansion on sensitive ecosystems. South Carolina’s diverse geography, ranging from coastal marshes to the Blue Ridge Mountains, and subtropical humid climate, offers a rich context for understanding environmental changes. The research utilizes various geospatial datasets, including the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), and National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery, to evaluate changes in forest cover, urbanization, and impervious surfaces from 2011 to 2021 as a decade of transition. The study areas were divided into buffer zones around intermittent and perennial streams, following South Carolina’s riparian management guidelines. The results indicate significant land-cover transitions, including a total of 3184.56 hectares of non-urban areas converting to forest within the 100 m buffer around intermittent streams. In contrast, 137.43 hectares of forest transitioned to urban land in the same buffer zones, with Spartanburg and Greenville leading the change. Intermittent stream buffers exhibited higher imperviousness (4.6–5.5%) compared to perennial stream buffers (3.3–4.5%), highlighting the increased urban pressure on these sensitive areas. Furthermore, tree canopy loss was significant, with counties such as Greenwood and Chesterfield experiencing substantial reductions in canopy cover. The use of high-resolution NAIP imagery validated the land-cover classifications, ensuring accuracy in the results. The findings emphasize the need for effective land-use management, particularly in the riparian zones, to mitigate the adverse impacts of urban expansion and to safeguard water quality and biodiversity in South Carolina’s streams.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjeev Sharma & Puskar Khanal, 2024. "Assessing Land-Cover Change and Urbanization Impact on Riparian Zones in South Carolina: A Decade of Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2232-:d:1548237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Junna & Zhang, Zhonglong & Greimann, Blair & Huang, Victor, 2018. "Application and evaluation of the HEC-RAS – riparian vegetation simulation module to the Sacramento River," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 158-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2232-:d:1548237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.