IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i11p1974-d1267853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revised Proposed Classifications for Typical Anthropogenic Soils in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shiheng Hao

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kening Wu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ling Li

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Xiaoliang Li

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongbin Wei

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Xiangyuan Wu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bingrui Liu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

As global industrialization and its associated anthropogenic activities rapidly increase, so too does the areal extent of human-altered soils. The soil classification framework must incorporate the classification schemes of these disturbed soils in order to remediate land. Soil Taxonomy (ST) and the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) are the most widely used soil classification systems in the world. In this study, 15 typical anthropogenic soil profiles with engineering and technical characteristics from China were selected for a classification study. The aim of this study was to clarify the classifications of these soil profiles in the ST, WRB, Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), and Geogenetic Soil Classification of China (GSCC), and make references accordingly. The results showed that the WRB can classify these soils as Technosols in the first level. ST can classify most of these soils as subgroups within the different great groups under Entisols, as well as the Human-Altered and Human-Transported Material classes within the soil family differentiae. For Chinese soil classification schemes, there is a large loophole in the CST regarding the classification of anthropogenic soils. Many anthropogenic soils cannot reflect these soils’ artificial and technical naming characteristics. For the CST, revised proposals based on the WRB and ST were proposed. Based on the artificial disturbance of soil layers, a manufactured layer was added to the diagnostic basis. The Artificalic Anthrosols suborder was added, and it can be divided into the Transporti-Artificalic Anthrosols and Alteri-Artificalic Anthrosols groups. The subgroups were defined by their levels of contamination, imperviousness, and artifact content. The “T” layer symbol was added to soil profile descriptions to reflect a specific layer about technology, such as A, E, B, and C, to reflect the main genetic horizons. This revised classification system is proposed for inclusion in the revised CST to account for the very large and expanding extent of disturbed soils in China and to remain current with other global soil taxonomy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiheng Hao & Kening Wu & Ling Li & Xiaoliang Li & Hongbin Wei & Xiangyuan Wu & Bingrui Liu, 2023. "Revised Proposed Classifications for Typical Anthropogenic Soils in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:1974-:d:1267853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/1974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/1974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastián Ureta & Alvaro Otaegui, 2021. "Seeing copiapósols: anthropogenic soils, strategic unknowing, and emergent taxonomies in northern Chile," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 881-892, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:1974-:d:1267853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.