IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p12-d1009522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Bedrock Differences on Plant Water Use Strategies in Typical Karst Areas of Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Ning

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Xiang Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Xia Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Hui Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Jie Ma

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Jianhua Cao

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Moisture conditions are important ecological factors limiting plant growth in karst areas. In karst areas, because bedrock exposure and permeability are significant and soils are dispersed—without spatial continuity—and shallow, the water storage required for plant uptake and growth in rock fissures as well as shallow soils is very limited, and therefore, water conditions are an important factor influencing plant growth. In order to discover the sources of water used by plants in the karst zone ecosystem of southwest China and the differences in plant water use under different lithological conditions, this study selected limestone and dolomite in the karst ecological test site of Maocun, Guilin, Guangxi, for comparison with the clastic rock area. By measuring the δD and δ 18 O composition of plant stem water and the potential water sources (soil water, groundwater and precipitation) of the dominant species in the study area, and using the IsoSource and soil water excess (SW-excess) models, we analyzed the proportion of water utilization by different vegetation types under different lithological conditions. The results showed that (1) the slope and intercept of the local rainfall line (LMWL) and soil water line (SWL) in the study area were smaller than those of the global rainfall line (GMWL), and also smaller than those of the local atmospheric precipitation line in Guilin (δD = 8.8δ 18 O + 17.96), indicating that the local rainfall is influenced by evaporation and is formed by nonequilibrium fractionation of isotopes; (2) in general, the plant water sources in the dolomite, limestone, and clastic areas were dominated by rainfall, groundwater, and soil water, respectively; and (3) the fluctuation range of SW-excess in karst areas was significantly greater than that in nonkarst areas, the xylem water of plants in karst areas was more depleted in δD than soil water, and groundwater was more enriched in δD than soil water, indicating that there might be an ecological–hydrological separation phenomenon in karst areas, i.e., the “two water worlds” hypothesis. The results of this study provide scientific data for hydrological regulation in the ecological restoration of karst areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Ning & Xiang Liu & Xia Wu & Hui Yang & Jie Ma & Jianhua Cao, 2022. "The Effect of Bedrock Differences on Plant Water Use Strategies in Typical Karst Areas of Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:12-:d:1009522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Wenna & Chen, Hongsong & Zou, Qiaoyun & Nie, Yunpeng, 2021. "Divergent root water uptake depth and coordinated hydraulic traits among typical karst plantations of subtropical China: Implication for plant water adaptation under precipitation changes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Zihe, Liu & Guodong, Jia & Xinxiao, Yu & Weiwei, Lu & Libo, Sun & Yusong, Wang & Baheti, Zierdie, 2021. "Morphological trait as a determining factor for Populus simonii Carr. to survive from drought in semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jianjun & Wang, Chuantao & Li, Hongchen & Liu, Yanfang & Li, Huijie & Ren, Ruiqi & Si, Bingcheng, 2023. "Rock water use by apple trees affected by physical properties of the underlying weathered rock," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:12-:d:1009522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.