IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1547-d912976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Space Change Process and Its Eco-Environmental Effects in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration of China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongyong Song

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Siyou Xia

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dongqian Xue

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Shuai Luo

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Liwei Zhang

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Donghua Wang

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

Abstract

Urban agglomeration is the strategic core area of social–economic high-quality development in the world. However, high-density agglomeration and high-speed expansion have caused dramatic changes in land space, leading to prominent eco-environmental problems and, thus, threatening human well-being. How to solve the contradiction between urban agglomeration land expansion and eco-environment protection has become an urgent scientific problem. In this paper, we constructed a framework of assessing land space change and its eco-environmental effects in the urban agglomeration by using the Geo-informatic Graphic, eco-environmental quality index (EQI), and eco-environmental contribution rate. We then quantitatively analyzed the characteristics of land space transition as well as its eco-environmental effects in the Guanzhong Plain urban Agglomeration (GPUA) based on the land use data in 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. The results indicated that from 1990 to 2020, the production space of the GPUA continued to shrink, the living space continued to expand, and the ecological space showed a fluctuating increasing trend. There were significant regional differences in the land space change of the GPUA, with 92.2% of the counties showing a significant contraction in agricultural production space, 93.3% and 91.1% showing a significant expansion in urban and rural living space, and 64.4% showing an increase in woodland ecological space. Agricultural production space is transformed into ecological space and living space, and living space occupies ecological space and agricultural production space, which is the main mode of land space transition in the GPUA. With the continuous expansion of low-quality and high-quality areas of the eco-environment and the continuous contraction of medium-quality areas, the improvement and deterioration of the eco-environmental quality of the GPUA have coexisted, first showing a trend of deterioration and then improvement. The transition of agricultural production space into grassland and woodland ecological space improved the eco-environmental quality, while the transition of grassland ecological space into agricultural production space, and the occupation of agricultural production space by urban and rural living space as well as industrial and mining production space resulted in the deterioration of eco-environmental quality. The findings of this study may provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the allocation of land space resources in ecologically fragile urban agglomeration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongyong Song & Siyou Xia & Dongqian Xue & Shuai Luo & Liwei Zhang & Donghua Wang, 2022. "Land Space Change Process and Its Eco-Environmental Effects in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1547-:d:912976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1547/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1547/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugenia Kalnay & Ming Cai, 2003. "Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6939), pages 528-531, May.
    2. Hualou Long & Yingnan Zhang & Li Ma & Shuangshuang Tu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Lanyi Wei & Yanjun Zhang & Lingzhi Wang & Xiaoyuan Mi & Xuying Wu & Zilang Cheng, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Evolution Patterns of “Production-Living-Ecological” Spaces and the Coordination Level and Optimization of the Functions in Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Shuo Yang & Hao Su, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Values in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Yongqiang Sun & Yan Li & Jing Gao & Yan Yan, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Urban Land Use Structure in Small Towns in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Blanco, Victor & Holzhauer, Sascha & Brown, Calum & Lagergren, Fredrik & Vulturius, Gregor & Lindeskog, Mats & Rounsevell, Mark D.A., 2017. "The effect of forest owner decision-making, climatic change and societal demands on land-use change and ecosystem service provision in Sweden," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 174-208.
    7. Kai Li & Beiying Zhang & Weidong Xiao & Yong Lu, 2022. "Land Use Transformation Based on Production−Living−Ecological Space and Associated Eco-Environment Effects: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Tim Newbold & Lawrence N. Hudson & Samantha L. L. Hill & Sara Contu & Igor Lysenko & Rebecca A. Senior & Luca Börger & Dominic J. Bennett & Argyrios Choimes & Ben Collen & Julie Day & Adriana De Palma, 2015. "Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7545), pages 45-50, April.
    9. Qiang Ren & Chunyang He & Qingxu Huang & Peijun Shi & Da Zhang & Burak Güneralp, 2022. "Impacts of urban expansion on natural habitats in global drylands," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 869-878, October.
    10. Hualou Long & Xiangbin Kong & Shougeng Hu & Yurui Li, 2021. "Land Use Transitions under Rapid Urbanization: A Perspective from Developing China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-9, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wusheng Zhao & Peiji Shi & Ya Wan & Yan Yao, 2023. "Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Urbanization Quality and Ecosystem Services in the Upper Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianhui Dong & Wenju Yun & Kening Wu & Shaoshuai Li & Bingrui Liu & Qiaoyuan Lu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Cultivated Land from 2010 to 2020 in Long’an County, Karst Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Xinyu Shi & Xiaoqing Zhao & Pei Huang & Zexian Gu & Junwei Pu & Shijie Zhou & Guoxun Qu & Qiaoqiao Zhao & Yan Feng & Yanjun Chen & Aimeng Xiang, 2023. "Rural Development under Poverty Governance: The Relationship between Rural Income and Land Use Transformation in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Fanya Qin & Katsue Fukamachi & Shozo Shibata, 2022. "Land-Use/Landscape Pattern Changes and Related Environmental Driving Forces in a Dong Ethnic Minority Village in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Bangrong Shu & Yi Qu, 2022. "Impact Mechanism of the Three Pilot Reforms of the Rural Land System on Rural Residential Land Use Transition: A Regime Shifts Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Bowen Shan & Jian Liu & Yaqiu Liu & Huanhuan Wang & Ailing Wang, 2022. "How Is Construction Land Transition Related to Rural Transformation? Evidence from a Plain County in China Based on the Grey Correlation Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Zipeng Chen & Yongqiang Liu & Shuangshuang Tu, 2022. "Comprehensive Eco-Environmental Effects Caused by Land Use Transition from the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces in a Typical Region: A Case Study of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Wenfei Zhang & Leilei Zhao, 2024. "Value Objective, Game Analysis and Approach to Rule of Law for Comprehensive Supervision of Agricultural Natural Resource Assets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Yuxin Qi & Yuandong Hu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors Analysis of Habitat Quality: A Case Study in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Law, Elizabeth A. & Macchi, Leandro & Baumann, Matthias & Decarre, Julieta & Gavier-Pizarro, Gregorio & Levers, Christian & Mastrangelo, Matías E. & Murray, Francisco & Müller, Daniel & Piquer-Rodrígu, 2021. "Fading opportunities for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in a south American deforestation hotspot," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 262.
    12. Ahmed, Khalid, 2015. "The sheer scale of China’s urban renewal and CO2 emissions: Multiple structural breaks, long-run relationship and short-run dynamics," MPRA Paper 71035, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Mohamed Fomba & Zinash Delebo Osunde & Souleymane Sidi Traoré & Appollonia Okhimamhe & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2024. "Urban Green Spaces in Bamako and Sikasso, Mali: Land Use Changes and Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Cong Wang & Xiaohan Zhang & Liwei Liu, 2025. "Land Use Change in the Russian Far East and Its Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Isaac Sarfo & Bi Shuoben & Li Beibei & Solomon Obiri Yeboah Amankwah & Emmanuel Yeboah & John Ernest Koku & Edward Kweku Nunoo & Clement Kwang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal development of land use systems, influences and climate variability in Southwestern Ghana (1970–2020)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9851-9883, August.
    16. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. repec:osf:osfxxx:th8j6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Pingxing Li & Chonggang Liu & Hui Cao, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Stress Caused by Land Use Transitions Considering the Location of Incremental Construction Lands: The Case of Southern Jiangsu in Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Camacho, Carmen & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín, 2015. "Land use dynamics and the environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 96-118.
    21. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1547-:d:912976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.