IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p798-d826464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Identification of Stakeholders’ Living Contexts in Stakeholder Participation Data: A Semantic, Spatial and Temporal Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amal Marzouki

    (Department of Information Systems, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Campus de Lévis 1595 Boulevard Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, QC G6V 0A6, Canada)

  • Sehl Mellouli

    (Department of Information Systems, Université Laval, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Sylvie Daniel

    (Department of Geomatics, Université Laval, 1055, Avenue du Séminaire, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

Abstract

Stakeholders’ Participation (SP) aims to involve stakeholders in decision-making processes about significant choices affecting their organizations, cities, or communities. Stakeholders’ participation is maintained through SP processes (SPPs) that may be traditional (e.g., physical assemblies) or online (e.g., online forums). Whether traditional or online, the purpose of SPPs is to collect and analyze data in a way that it would bring a benefit to a given decision-making process. In SPPs, stakeholders try to communicate (a part of) their living contexts, i.e., to present their objectives, daily problems, intentions, and issues they are facing within their environment. A major challenge of decision-makers is then to ensure that the living contexts of stakeholders are considered in SPPs for an effective implementation of project and policies. This paper focuses on the specific issue of the “stakeholders’ living context identification” and attempts to account for how stakeholders implicitly identify their living contexts in their SP comments. Based on a qualitative analysis of SP data from four case studies in two countries, this paper identified a set of semantic, spatial, and temporal patterns allowing to capture the stakeholders’ living contexts in SPPs data. Moreover, a conceptual model emphasizing the importance for decision-makers to capture and understand semantic, spatial, and temporal dimensions in SPPs is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Amal Marzouki & Sehl Mellouli & Sylvie Daniel, 2022. "The Identification of Stakeholders’ Living Contexts in Stakeholder Participation Data: A Semantic, Spatial and Temporal Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:798-:d:826464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/798/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/798/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Veronesi & Kevin Keasey, 2015. "Patient and Public Participation in the English NHS: An assessment of experimental implementation processes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 543-564, April.
    2. Devendra Potnis & Iman Tahamtan, 2021. "Hashtags for gatekeeping of information on social media," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1234-1246, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Landry Signé, 2017. "Public service delivery – What matters for successful implementation and what can policy leaders do?," Research papers & Policy papers 1705, Policy Center for the New South.
    2. Devendra Potnis & Macy Halladay, 2022. "Information practices of administrators for controlling information in an online community of new mothers in rural America," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1621-1640, November.
    3. Jie Xin & Wan Ni & Zhiyuan Yu, 2021. "Research on Ternary Interactive Gatekeeping Model for Multi-Channel Networks (MCNs) in Social Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Landry Signé, 2017. "Policy Implementation – A synthesis of the Study of Policy Implementation and the Causes of Policy Failure," Research papers & Policy papers 1703, Policy Center for the New South.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:798-:d:826464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.