IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i1p136-d725554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Landscape Fragmentation and the Driving Forces on Haitan Island, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwen Ai

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    University Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Liuqing Yang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    University Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yanfen Liu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    University Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Kunyong Yu

    (University Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Jian Liu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    University Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Island ecosystems have distinct and unique vulnerabilities that place them at risk from threats to their ecology and socioeconomics. Spatially exhibiting the fragmentation process of island landscapes and identifying their driving factors are the fundamental prerequisites for the maintenance of island ecosystems and the rational utilization of islands. Haitan Island was chosen as a case study for understanding landscape fragmentation on urbanizing Islands. Based on remote sensing technology, three Landsat images from 2000 to 2020, landscape pattern index, transect gradient analysis, and moving window method were used in this study. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, impervious land increased by 462.57%. In 2000, the predominant landscape was cropland (46.34%), which shifted to impervious land (35.20%) and forest (32.90%) in 2020. Combining the moving window method and Semivariogram, 1050 m was considered to be the best scale to reflect the landscape fragmentation of Haitan Island. Under this scale, it was found that the landscape fragmentation of Haitan Island generally increased with time and had obvious spatial heterogeneity. We set up sampling bands along the coastline and found that the degree of landscape fragmentation, advancing from the coast inland, was decreasing. Transects analysis showed the fragmentation intensity of the coastal zone: the north-western and southern wooded zones decreased, while the concentration of urban farmland in the north-central and southern areas increased. The implementation of a comprehensive experimental area plan on Haitan Island has disturbed the landscape considerably. In 2000, landscape fragmentation was mainly influenced by topography and agricultural production. The critical infrastructure construction, reclamation and development of landscape resources have greatly contributed to the urbanisation and tourism of Haitan Island, and landscape fragmentation in 2013 was at its highest. Due to China’s “Grain for Green Project” and the Comprehensive Territorial Spatial Planning policy (especially the protection of ecological control lines), the fragmentation of Haitan Island was slowing. This study investigated the optimal spatial scale for analyzing spatiotemporal changes in landscape fragmentation on Haitan Island from 2000 to 2020, and the essential influencing factors in urban islands from the perspective of natural environment and social development, which could provide a basis for land use management and ecological planning on the island.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwen Ai & Liuqing Yang & Yanfen Liu & Kunyong Yu & Jian Liu, 2022. "Dynamic Landscape Fragmentation and the Driving Forces on Haitan Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:136-:d:725554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Aguilar & Edgar Mendoza & Rodolfo Silva, 2021. "Interaction between Tourism Carrying Capacity and Coastal Squeeze in Mazatlan, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guoqiang Ma & Qiujie Li & Shuyu Yang & Rong Zhang & Lixun Zhang & Jianping Xiao & Guojun Sun, 2022. "Analysis of Landscape Pattern Evolution and Driving Forces Based on Land-Use Changes: A Case Study of Yilong Lake Watershed on Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Minghui Ou & Yexi Zhong & Hongzhi Ma & Wenhui Wang & Manyu Bi, 2022. "Impacts of Policy-Driven Transformation in the Livelihoods of Fishermen on Agricultural Landscape Patterns: A Case Study of a Fishing Village, Island of Poyang Lake," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:136-:d:725554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.