IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p847-d613960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Ecological Analysis of Green Network in Urban Area Using Circuit Theory and Least-Cost Path

Author

Listed:
  • Oh-Sung Kwon

    (Department of Ecology & Environment, Gyeonggi Research Institute, Suwon 16207, Korea)

  • Jin-Hyo Kim

    (Forestland Spatial Planning Division, Korea Forest Conservation Association, Daejeon 35262, Korea)

  • Jung-Hwa Ra

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41561, Korea)

Abstract

Quantitative securing of green space in already developed cities has many practical limitations due to socio-economic limitations. Currently, South Korea is planning a green network to secure and inject effective green space, but it is difficult to reflect it in the actual space plan due to the abstract plan. This study utilizes circuit theory and least-cost path methods for presenting a green network that is objectified and applicable to spatial planning. First, an analysis of the Least-cost Path revealed 69 least-cost paths between 43 core green areas of the study site. Most least-cost paths have been identified as passing through small green areas and streams in the city. Using the circuit theory, it was also possible to distinguish areas other than least-cost paths from areas with high potential for development, areas where target species are concentrated within corridors. In particular, areas with relatively high green network improvement effects were derived within and around corridors. This study is most significant in establishing and evaluating existing urban green networks, overcoming the limitations discussed at the linear level and expanding to the area level. To increase the utilization of this study in the future, field surveys and monitoring studies on target species need to be supplemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Oh-Sung Kwon & Jin-Hyo Kim & Jung-Hwa Ra, 2021. "Landscape Ecological Analysis of Green Network in Urban Area Using Circuit Theory and Least-Cost Path," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:847-:d:613960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo-Xun Huang & Shang-Chia Chiou & Wen-Ying Li, 2021. "Landscape Pattern and Ecological Network Structure in Urban Green Space Planning: A Case Study of Fuzhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Jiaxing Wei & Jing Qian & Yu Tao & Feng Hu & Weixin Ou, 2018. "Evaluating Spatial Priority of Urban Green Infrastructure for Urban Sustainability in Areas of Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Pukou in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yimin Li & Juanzhen Zhao & Jing Yuan & Peikun Ji & Xuanlun Deng & Yiming Yang, 2022. "Constructing the Ecological Security Pattern of Nujiang Prefecture Based on the Framework of “Importance–Sensitivity–Connectivity”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Bohao Cui & Yili Zhang & Zhaofeng Wang & Changjun Gu & Linshan Liu & Bo Wei & Dianqing Gong & Mohan Kumar Rai, 2022. "Ecological Risk Assessment of Transboundary Region Based on Land-Cover Change: A Case Study of Gandaki River Basin, Himalayas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Shen, Jiake & Zhu, Wenjia & Peng, Zhenwei & Wang, Yuncai, 2023. "Improving landscape ecological network connectivity in urbanizing areas from dual dimensions of structure and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    5. Song, Lili & Wu, Yingying & Wu, Moyu & Ma, Jie & Cao, Wei, 2023. "An integrated approach to model connectivity and identify modules for habitat networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    6. Hao Li & Hongyu Chen & Minghao Wu & Kai Zhou & Xiang Zhang & Zhicheng Liu, 2022. "A Dynamic Evaluation Method of Urban Ecological Networks Combining Graphab and the FLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Fachao Liang & Mengdi Bai & Qiyu Hu & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2022. "Ecological Security and Ecosystem Quality: A Case Study of Xia-Zhang-Quan Metropolitan Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinan He & Dingkai Chen & Xiaoqi Shang & Linwei Han & Longyu Shi, 2022. "Resident Satisfaction of Urban Green Spaces through the Lens of Landsenses Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Xichen Ge & Liang Sun & Jiongzhen Chen & Shuangrong Cai, 2022. "Land Utilization, Landscape Pattern, and Ecological Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Discrimination and Overlap from Suining, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Luisa Sturiale & Alessandro Scuderi & Giuseppe Timpanaro, 2022. "A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach of “Tree” Meaning in the New Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Jiale Zhou & Xiaofen Yu & Xizan Jin & Nuannuan Mao, 2021. "Government Competition, Land Supply Structure and Semi-Urbanization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Irena Niedźwiecka-Filipiak & Justyna Rubaszek & Jerzy Potyrała & Paweł Filipiak, 2019. "The Method of Planning Green Infrastructure System with the Use of Landscape-Functional Units (Method LaFU) and its Implementation in the Wrocław Functional Area (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Ronchi, Silvia & Pontarollo, Nicola & Serpieri, Carolina, 2021. "Clustering the built form at LAU2 level for addressing sustainable policies: Insights from the Belgium case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi, 2021. "Role of Urban Greening Strategies for Environmental Sustainability—A Review and Assessment in the Context of Saudi Arabian Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Jing Bian & Hong Ren & Ping Liu & Yu Zhang, 2018. "Sustainable Urbanization Performance Evaluation Based on “Origin” and “Modernization” Perspectives: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Tianyang Ge & Wenjun Hou & Yang Xiao, 2023. "Study on the Regeneration of City Centre Spatial Structure Pedestrianisation Based on Space Syntax: Case Study on 21 City Centres in the UK," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Jan K. Kazak & Jakub Chruściński & Szymon Szewrański, 2018. "The Development of a Novel Decision Support System for the Location of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Zheng Zhu & Qingyun He & Xiang Zhu, 2022. "Spatial Analysis for the Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality of Urban Residential Districts Based on 3D City Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Xuemin Shi & Mingzhou Qin & Bin Li & Dan Zhang, 2021. "A Framework for Optimizing Green Infrastructure Networks Based on Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Zhigang Li & Jie Yang & Jialong Zhong & Dong Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Agglomeration Ecological Sustainability and Identification of Influencing Factors: Based on the 3DEF Model and the Random Forest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Zixuan Lian & Xianhui Feng, 2022. "Urban Green Space Pattern in Core Cities of the Greater Bay Area Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    17. Guixuan You & Tianyi Chen & Peixin Shen & Yuandong Hu, 2023. "Designing an Ecological Network in Yichang Central City in China Based on Habitat Quality Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Lingzi Liang & Xiuzhi Wang & Jian-Wen Qiu & Qin Gong & Xun Li & Siu-Tai Tsim, 2025. "A Review of Fengshui Forests: Ecological Functions, Humanistic Values, and Potential Applications to Enhance Biodiversity in Urban Green Landscapes and Achieve Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Zhenrao Cai & Dan Gao & Xin Xiao & Linguo Zhou & Chaoyang Fang, 2023. "The Flow of Green Exercise, Its Characteristics, Mechanism, and Pattern in Urban Green Space Networks: A Case Study of Nangchang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Yuanyuan Chen & Xinli Ke & Min Min & Yue Zhang & Yaqiang Dai & Lanping Tang, 2022. "Do We Need More Urban Green Space to Alleviate PM 2.5 Pollution? A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:847-:d:613960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.