IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i4p382-d531290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fit-For-Purpose Applications in Colombia: Defining Land Boundary Conflicts between Indigenous Sikuani and Neighbouring Settler Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Becerra

    (Maestría en Ciencias de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 11021-110231588, Colombia
    Kadaster International, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Mathilde Molendijk

    (Kadaster International, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Nicolas Porras

    (Kadaster International, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Piet Spijkers

    (Kadaster International, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Bastiaan Reydon

    (Kadaster International, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

  • Javier Morales

    (ITC Faculty, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

One of the most difficult types of land-related conflict is that between Indigenous peoples and third parties, such as settler farmers or companies looking for new opportunities who are encroaching on Indigenous communal lands. Nearly 30% of Colombia’s territory is legally owned by Indigenous peoples. This article focuses on boundary conflicts between Indigenous peoples and neighbouring settler farmers in the Cumaribo municipality in Colombia. Boundary conflicts here raise fierce tensions: discrimination of the others and perceived unlawful occupation of land. At the request of Colombia’s rural cadastre (Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC)), the Dutch cadastre (Kadaster) applied the fit-for-purpose (FFP) land administration approach in three Indigenous Sikuani reserves in Cumaribo to analyse how participatory mapping can provide a trustworthy basis for conflict resolution. The participatory FFP approach was used to map land conflicts between the reserves and the neighbouring settler farmers and to discuss possible solutions of overlapping claims with all parties involved. Both Indigenous leaders and neighbouring settler farmers measured their perceived claims in the field, after a thorough socialisation process and a social cartography session. In a public inspection, field measurements were shown, with the presence of the cadastral authority IGAC. Showing and discussing the results with all stakeholders helped to clarify the conflicts, to reduce the conflict to specific, relatively small, geographical areas, and to define concrete steps towards solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Becerra & Mathilde Molendijk & Nicolas Porras & Piet Spijkers & Bastiaan Reydon & Javier Morales, 2021. "Fit-For-Purpose Applications in Colombia: Defining Land Boundary Conflicts between Indigenous Sikuani and Neighbouring Settler Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:382-:d:531290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sochanny Hak & John McAndrew & Andreas Neef, 2018. "Impact of Government Policies and Corporate Land Grabs on Indigenous People’s Access to Common Lands and Livelihood Resilience in Northeast Cambodia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Bastiaan Reydon & Mathilde Molendijk & Nicolas Porras & Gabriel Siqueira, 2021. "The Amazon Forest Preservation by Clarifying Property Rights and Potential Conflicts: How Experiments Using Fit-for-Purpose Can Help," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Haller & Fabian Käser & Mariah Ngutu, 2020. "Does Commons Grabbing Lead to Resilience Grabbing? The Anti-Politics Machine of Neo-Liberal Agrarian Development and Local Responses," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-7, July.
    2. Linyan Ma & Zichun Pan & Yameng Wang & Feng Wei, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Success or Failure of China’s Overseas Arable Land Investment Projects—Based on the Countries along the “Belt and Road”," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Cashore, Benjamin & Nathan, Iben, 2020. "Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2021. "Nature of common lands in a post-communist country – The Polish perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Chanrith Ngin & Andreas Neef, 2021. "Contested Land Restitution Processes in Cambodia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Albert Sanghoon Park, 2023. "Building resilience knowledge for sustainable development: Insights from development studies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-33, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Zhilong Wu & Bo Li & Xuhuan Dai & Ying Hou, 2020. "Coupled Relationship between Rural Livelihoods and the Environment at a Village Scale: A Case Study in the Mongolian Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Lisa Alvarado, 2019. "Institutional Change on a Conservationist Frontier: Local Responses to a Grabbing Process in the Name of Environmental Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Peijun Wang & Jing Wang & Chunbo Zhu & Yan Li & Weijun Sun & Jinyi Li, 2023. "Factors Influencing Livelihood Resilience of Households Resettled from Coal Mining Areas and Their Measurement—A Case Study of Huaibei City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:382-:d:531290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.