Author
Listed:
- Sara Almarri
(Qatar Finance and Business Academy (QFBA), Northumbria University in Qatar, Qatar Financial Centre Tower 2, Al Wahda Street, West Bay, Doha P.O. Box 23245, Qatar)
- Hamza El Kaddouri
(Qatar Finance and Business Academy (QFBA), Northumbria University in Qatar, Qatar Financial Centre Tower 2, Al Wahda Street, West Bay, Doha P.O. Box 23245, Qatar)
Abstract
Background: The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has become a central strategic actor in capital-intensive firms; however, little evidence links CFO risk-taking behaviour to firm performance outside developed markets. This study examines how CFO risk-taking affects corporate financial performance in the Industrial, Energy and Petrochemical sectors of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Methods: Using 260 firm-year observations (2015–2024) from 26 listed firms, this study measures CFO risk-taking through financial leverage, capital expenditure intensity, earnings volatility, and cash flow volatility, and firm performance through Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Earnings Per Share (EPS). Panel Fixed-Effects regression and a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model are used to estimate contemporaneous and dynamic relationships, guided by Agency Theory, Upper Echelons Theory and Prospect Theory. Results: CFO risk-taking proxies are significantly associated with ROA: leverage and cash flow volatility reduce ROA, while earnings volatility and capital expenditure raise it. The ROE model is a robust null finding, and EPS evidence is limited to earnings volatility. The VAR results indicate time-varying, exploratory, and dynamic relationships between risk-taking and performance. Conclusions: This study contributes to the literature in three ways: it shifts the analytical focus from the widely studied CEO to the increasingly influential CFO; it provides the first large-scale empirical evidence on CFO risk-taking for the under-researched GCC region; and it operationalises CFO risk-taking through a finer set of proxies than prior work. The findings imply that GCC boards and investors should treat financial leverage and cash flow stability as behavioural risk indicators and that regulators may benefit from encouraging more granular CFO-level risk disclosure.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:8:p:583-:d:2006545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.