IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v19y2026i7p511-d1986966.html

Assessing the Association Between FinTech-Related Policy Reforms and the Profitability of Banks in Qatar: A Preliminary Two-Decade Panel Analysis (2005–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulaziz Mohammed A. Almohannadi

    (Qatar Finance and Business Academy-Northumbria University, Doha 23245, Qatar)

  • Ali Malik

    (Qatar Finance and Business Academy-Northumbria University, Doha 23245, Qatar)

Abstract

This paper examines the association between two Financial Technology (FinTech)-related policy windows and the profitability of Qatari commercial banks over a twenty-year horizon (2005–2024). The analysis is anchored by two structural breaks: in 2017, the Qatar Central Bank (QCB) established its FinTech task force and lifted restrictions on the implementation of a regulatory sandbox and centralised electronic know your customer (e-KYC) framework; and during the digital-acceleration period in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the issuance of digital banking licences. FinTech adoption is not measured directly at the bank level; the two policy windows are used as intent-to-treat proxies. Using return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), bank performance is measured and influenced by bank size (log of total assets), bank age and type (Islamic and conventional). Multiple diagnostics of Hausman and Breusch–Pagan support the use of fixed-effects (FE) panel regressions with cluster-robust standard errors on an unbalanced panel of 125 bank–year observations. The results show a positive coefficient on the post-2017 dummy in the ROE model (β = 0.0306, p = 0.054, cluster-robust) and no detectable change in ROA (β = −0.00058, p = 0.868). For the post-2020 phase, both coefficients are positive but do not reach conventional significance (ROA: β = 0.00218, p = 0.539; ROE: β = 0.0224, p = 0.150). There is no systematic difference between Islamic and conventional banks that is offered by the interaction terms in either phase. Given the small sample (nine banks, eight effective clusters after the FE singleton drop; 125 observations) and the use of policy-window proxies rather than direct bank-level FinTech measures, the design cannot isolate the effect of the FinTech-related reforms from concurrent macroeconomic, sectorial or pandemic-related developments, and the cluster-robust p -values should be read as approximate. The results are therefore presented as preliminary and indicative. Read in light of these design constraints, the results are consistent with incremental rather than transformative change around the FinTech-related policy windows in Qatar, with results influenced more by timing, scale economies, and regulatory saturation than by bank type. The country-specific empirical findings can help restore context to the literature on the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) average, and provide measured guidance for bank managers and regulators working toward the Qatar National Vision 2030 digital aspiration.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulaziz Mohammed A. Almohannadi & Ali Malik, 2026. "Assessing the Association Between FinTech-Related Policy Reforms and the Profitability of Banks in Qatar: A Preliminary Two-Decade Panel Analysis (2005–2024)," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:7:p:511-:d:1986966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/7/511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/7/511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:7:p:511-:d:1986966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.