IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v19y2026i7p474-d1978341.html

Insolvency in the Construction Sector: Global Research Insights and Empirical Evidence from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Janappriya Jayawardana

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Pabasara Wijeratne

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Zora Vrcelj

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Kumudu Weththasinghe

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Malindu Sandanayake

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Centre for Future Construction, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

The construction sector continues to experience elevated levels of insolvency, driven by an interplay of structural vulnerabilities and macroeconomic pressures, including supply chain disruptions and cost inflation. These challenges have been particularly prominent in Australia, especially among micro and small construction firms, which account for over 90% of reported insolvency cases. In 2024, the Australian construction sector contributed nearly one-quarter of all company insolvencies nationally. This study undertakes a comprehensive review of construction insolvency research, synthesising key themes, causes, early warning indicators, and mitigation strategies, while contextualising global insights using empirical evidence from the Australian construction sector. The methodology integrated systematic literature screening, scientometric analysis, and critical thematic synthesis with a descriptive and selective statistical examination of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) data, complemented by practice-informed insights. The review identified dominant research trajectories, centred on financial risk management, insolvency prediction models, project-level cost and governance risks, and emerging data-driven approaches. Empirical analysis revealed that inadequate cash flow (~16–20%), poor strategic management (~12–18%), and weak financial controls (~11–15%) consistently rank among the leading causes of construction firm failure over the last decade. Indicators such as non-payment of statutory obligations and deteriorating working capital are observed in over half of insolvency cases, highlighting persistent structural fragility. Although global strategic focus areas emphasised financial monitoring and early warning systems, practice-informed findings indicated that effective mitigation requires their operationalisation through capability development, early intervention tools, regulatory oversight, and stakeholder-informed support mechanisms. The study shows how global insolvency risk concepts align with Australian regulatory evidence and highlights the need to translate early-warning approaches into accessible tools and support mechanisms for micro and small construction firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Janappriya Jayawardana & Pabasara Wijeratne & Zora Vrcelj & Kumudu Weththasinghe & Malindu Sandanayake, 2026. "Insolvency in the Construction Sector: Global Research Insights and Empirical Evidence from Australia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:7:p:474-:d:1978341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/7/474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/7/474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:7:p:474-:d:1978341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.