IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v19y2026i6p438-d1969186.html

Financial Accounting Disclosures (FAD) in the UAE: Investor Reactions to Negative Financial News, Framing Bias and AI Channel Reliance

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Haffar

    (Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 341799, United Arab Emirates)

  • Shatha Mustafa Hussain

    (Finance and Accounting Department, College of Business, City University Ajman, Ajman P.O. Box 18484, United Arab Emirates)

  • Amer Alaya

    (Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 341799, United Arab Emirates)

  • Serap Emik

    (Department of Business, Faculty of Business, Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 58855, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mohammad Jammal

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Law, The British University in Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 345015, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This study examines how the relationship between perceived financial accounting disclosures (FAD) and investor reactions to negative financial news (IRNFN) is conditioned by two individual-level moderators among 310 retail investors holding shares in project-based organisations (PBOs) listed on the Dubai Financial Market and Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange. The two moderators are framing bias susceptibility, a cognitive predisposition to be influenced by presentational form, and AI channel reliance (AICR), the extent to which investors rely on AI-mediated information channels—including algorithmic news aggregators, robo-advisory tools, AI-curated social media feeds, and automated sentiment-scored financial alerts—for receiving and interpreting corporate disclosures. Drawing on Behavioural Finance Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the study investigates whether the strength of the FAD–IRNFN association depends on these cognitive and informational processing conditions. The measurement model was estimated using confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS 25, and the moderation hypotheses were tested through path analysis with mean-centred composite scores and bias-corrected bootstrap inference, with a latent interaction robustness check reported in parallel. AI channel reliance emerged as a substantial moderator of the FAD–IRNFN relationship, while framing bias provided a smaller, marginally significant moderating effect. The findings are consistent with the theoretical expectation that, in AI-mediated information environments, the perceived quality and presentation of complex disclosures are associated with stronger, rather than weaker, investor reactions to negative news. Because the design is cross-sectional and based on self-reported data, the results are interpreted as associations rather than causal effects, with implications for disclosure regulation, corporate communication, and AI platform design in the UAE and comparable emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Haffar & Shatha Mustafa Hussain & Amer Alaya & Serap Emik & Mohammad Jammal, 2026. "Financial Accounting Disclosures (FAD) in the UAE: Investor Reactions to Negative Financial News, Framing Bias and AI Channel Reliance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:438-:d:1969186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/6/438/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/6/438/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:6:p:438-:d:1969186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.