IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v19y2026i2p98-d1854702.html

Stock Liquidity and Social Media Analyst Coverage: Evidence from Tick Size Pilot Program

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqi Han

    (College of Business and Public Management, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 320506, China)

  • Dan Luo

    (Gary W. Rollins College of Business, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA)

  • Yinge Zhang

    (College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070, USA)

Abstract

Social media analysts (SMAs) on venues such as Seeking Alpha have become an important information intermediary for retail investors, particularly for smaller firms that receive limited attention from traditional channels. This study examines the effects of the wider tick size on social media analyst coverage in the U.S. capital market. Using the SEC’s 2016–2018 Tick Size Pilot Program as a quasi-natural experiment and a difference-in-differences design on approximately 2400 small-cap stocks, we find that wider tick size leads to a significant decline in the number of articles and unique contributors for treated firms. This effect is particularly strong for stocks with initially narrow bid–ask spreads. Furthermore, we find no significant change in the sentiment and quality of SMAs’ reports, indicating that the decrease in coverage is primarily driven by liquidity considerations rather than fundamental changes in the firms. These results imply that market microstructure reforms can inadvertently weaken the retail investor information ecosystem by discouraging independent research production.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqi Han & Dan Luo & Yinge Zhang, 2026. "Stock Liquidity and Social Media Analyst Coverage: Evidence from Tick Size Pilot Program," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:98-:d:1854702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/2/98/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/19/2/98/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:98-:d:1854702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.