IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p518-d1751028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Campaign Descriptions and Visual Features in Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lenny Phulong Mamaro

    (Department of Finance Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa (UNISA), P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

  • Athenia Bongani Sibindi

    (Department of Finance Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa (UNISA), P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

  • Daniel Makina

    (Department of Finance Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa (UNISA), P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

Abstract

Crowdfunding has gained popularity among entrepreneurs who seek funding for their business projects on crowdfunding platforms. The success of these campaigns largely depends on the ability to attract and convince backers to support the fundraising initiative. Drawing on signalling, persuasion, and attribution theories, this study examines how campaign descriptions and visual features specifically word description length, spelling errors, images, frequently asked questions (FAQs), number of backers, funding target, flexible funding, and campaign duration. The study utilised econometric techniques such as ordinary least squares and logistic regression models on a dataset consisting of 854 small and medium enterprises and entrepreneurial projects collected from Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and Fundraised databases. The probability of success is significantly increased by the length of project descriptions, the inclusion of images, and an increased number of backers. On the other hand, higher funding targets and flexible funding models decrease the probability of success. These results support the attribution and persuasion theories, indicating that detailed project descriptions can address information gaps and improve the project’s credibility and trustworthiness. This study contributes to the literature by providing an empirically grounded understanding of how textual and visual elements influence crowdfunding outcomes in the African context and offers practical guidance for entrepreneurs and investors on designing effective campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenny Phulong Mamaro & Athenia Bongani Sibindi & Daniel Makina, 2025. "The Role of Campaign Descriptions and Visual Features in Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Africa," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:518-:d:1751028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/518/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/518/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Hou & Leiming Li & Bingquan Liu, 2020. "Backers investment behavior on explicit and implicit factors in reward-based crowdfunding based on ELM theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Wessel, Michael & Adam, Martin & Benlian, Alexander, 2019. "The impact of sold-out early birds on option selection in reward-based crowdfunding," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112150, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Ye Liu & Ke Zhang & Weili Xue & Ziyu Zhou, 2024. "Crowdfunding innovative but risky new ventures: the importance of less ambiguous tone," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-43, December.
    4. Song, Yang & Berger, Ron & Yosipof, Abraham & Barnes, Bradley R., 2019. "Mining and investigating the factors influencing crowdfunding success," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Orel Babayoff & Onn Shehory, 2022. "The role of semantics in the success of crowdfunding projects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Yan Xu & Jian Ni, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Learning and Disincentives in Crowdfunding Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6819-6864, September.
    7. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    8. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    9. Wessel, Michael & Adam, Martin & Benlian, Alexander, 2019. "The impact of sold-out early birds on option selection in reward-based crowdfunding," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110458, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Prisco & Valerio Muto & Ciro Troise & Mario Tani, 2022. "How to Engage the Crowds to Create Value? Evidence from the Pathfinder Arena Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Wang, Yinghuan & Wang, Baolin & Yan, Yan, 2022. "Does network externality affect your project? Evidences from reward-based technology crowdfunding," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Adam, Martin & Wessel, Michael & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 119304, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Irene Comeig & Ernesto Mesa-Vázquez & Pau Sendra-Pons & Amparo Urbano, 2020. "Rational Herding in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: An MTurk Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Sewaid, Ahmed & Garcia-Cestona, Miguel & Silaghi, Florina, 2021. "Resolving information asymmetries in financing new product development: The case of reward-based crowdfunding," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    6. Qingxiang Li & Nianxin Wang, 2024. "Fundraiser engagement, third-party endorsement and crowdfunding performance: A configurational theory approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-31, August.
    7. Martin Adam & Michael Wessel & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 427-445, June.
    8. Veronica Crescenzo & Angelo Bonfanti & Paola Castellani & Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez, 2022. "Effective entrepreneurial narrative design in reward crowdfunding campaigns for social ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 773-800, June.
    9. Croitor, Evgheni & Werner, Dominick & Benlian, Alexander, 2021. "The Effects of Control Mechanisms on Complementors’ Behavioral Intentions: An Empirical Study of Reward-Based Crowdfunding Platforms," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124635, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Ting Luo & Jing Zhou & Shang Gao, 2025. "Experience mining based on text analytics and case-based reasoning to support crowdfunding design," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1395-1422, June.
    11. Sun Hee Lee & Sang‐Youn Lee, 2024. "The effect of signaling on crowdfunding performance on social economy organizations in South Korea," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 783-813, September.
    12. Agnieszka Szewczyk & Zbigniew Stempnakowski, 2021. "Social Energy as the Driving Force behind Crowdfunding—Analysis and Classification of Selected Attributes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.
    13. Abraham Yosipof & Netanel Drori & Or Elroy & Yannis Pierraki, 2024. "Textual sentiment analysis and description characteristics in crowdfunding success: The case of cybersecurity and IoT industries," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Carè, R. & Fatima, R. & Cerciello, M. & Taddeo, S., 2025. "Exploring the landscape of green crowdfunding: Trends, themes, and insights from a bibliometric review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Jung, Eunjun & Lee, Changjun & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "Effective strategies to attract crowdfunding investment based on the novelty of business ideas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Cerchione, Roberto & Liccardo, Giuseppe & Passaro, Renato, 2025. "Crowdfunding business models through the lens of sustainable development: A taxonomy for backers and funders," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Elham Yazdani & Anindita Chakravarty & Jeff Inman, 2025. "(Mis)alignment between facial and textual emotions and its effects on donors engagement behavior in online crowdsourcing platforms," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 968-988, July.
    18. Junjuan Du, 2023. "Rational or Impulsive? Early Backers’ Investment Behavior in Agri-Food Crowdfunding from 4P–4C Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    19. Carolin Bock & Sven Siebeneicher & Jens Rockel, 2022. "The “C” in crowdfunding is for co-financing: exploring participative co-financing, a complement of novel and traditional bank financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(9), pages 1559-1602, November.
    20. Oo, Pyayt P. & Jiang, Lin & Sahaym, Arvin & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Chan, Richard, 2023. "Actions in words: How entrepreneurs use diversified and changing speech acts to achieve funding success," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:518-:d:1751028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.