IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p357-d1691373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Investigation into the Investment–Saving Relationship Through Granger Non-Causality Panel Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Focacci

    (Department of Management, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The investment–saving relationship has been the subject of much debate. On the one hand, there is the conventional mainstream neoclassical school of thought that advocates for the idea that saving determines investment. On the other hand, heterodox economists (mainly in the post-Keynesian/structuralist tradition) posit an inverse relationship between these variables. This article empirically investigates the direction of causality in order to contribute to the existing literature on the topic. To this end, two Granger panel tests are applied to a dataset of 106 countries over the period from 1980 to 2023. The econometric techniques used are effective in accounting for both cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity in the data. In summary, our findings align with the theoretical models that posit bidirectional causality as the most probable explanation of the mechanism driving investment and saving. More specifically, they are consistent with post-Keynesian (demand-led) assumptions describing an open economy operating below its maximum potential growth rate within a current account solvency constraint.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Focacci, 2025. "An Empirical Investigation into the Investment–Saving Relationship Through Granger Non-Causality Panel Tests," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:357-:d:1691373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glick, Reuven & Rogoff, Kenneth, 1995. "Global versus country-specific productivity shocks and the current account," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 159-192, February.
    2. Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116.
    3. Payne, James E., 2005. "Savings-investment dynamics in Mexico," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 525-534, July.
    4. Baxter, Marianne & Crucini, Mario J, 1993. "Explaining Saving-Investment Correlations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(3), pages 416-436, June.
    5. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 1991. "Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(1), pages 43-61.
    6. Nicholas Kaldor, 1955. "Alternative Theories of Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 83-100.
    7. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    8. Artūras Juodis & Yiannis Karavias & Vasilis Sarafidis, 2021. "A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 93-112, January.
    9. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    10. Christophe Hurlin & Valérie Mignon, 2007. "Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests," Working Papers halshs-00159842, HAL.
    11. Khan, Saleheen, 2017. "The savings and investment relationship: The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle revisited," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 324-332.
    12. Dumitrescu, Elena-Ivona & Hurlin, Christophe, 2012. "Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1450-1460.
    13. Pierre Roche Seka, 2011. "Is saving really prior to investment? Time series and panel evidence in the WAEMU," African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 123-142, September.
    14. Ugur Korkut Pata, 2018. "The Feldstein Horioka puzzle in E7 countries: Evidence from panel cointegration and asymmetric causality analysis," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 968-984, November.
    15. Pierre Roche Seka, 2011. "Is saving really prior to investment? Time series and panel evidence in the WAEMU," African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 123-142, September.
    16. Luciano Lopez & Sylvain Weber, 2017. "Testing for Granger causality in panel data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 17(4), pages 972-984, December.
    17. Murphy, Robert G., 1984. "Capital mobility and the relationship between saving and investment rates in OECD countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 327-342, December.
    18. Feldstein, Martin & Horioka, Charles, 1980. "Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(358), pages 314-329, June.
    19. Singh, Tarlok, 2008. "Testing the Saving-Investment correlations in India: An evidence from single-equation and system estimators," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1064-1079, September.
    20. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    21. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 2006. "Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply and Economic Growth," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 319-336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaqi Xiao & Artūras Juodis & Yiannis Karavias & Vasilis Sarafidis & Jan Ditzen, 2023. "Improved tests for Granger noncausality in panel data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 23(1), pages 230-242, March.
    2. Talan, Amogh & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards clean energy consumption in G7: Can financial sector, ICT and democracy help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Nwani, Chinazaekpere & Usman, Ojonugwa & Okere, Kingsley Ikechukwu & Bekun, Festus Victor, 2023. "Technological pathways to decarbonisation and the role of renewable energy: A study of European countries using consumption-based metrics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Rehman, Mubeen Abdur, 2024. "How has FinTech become a solution for minerals management?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Naib ALAKBAROV & Yılmaz BAYAR, 2021. "International Financial Market Integration and The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle: Evidence from Emerging Market Economies," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 143-165, December.
    6. Xie, Bofeng & Rehman, Mubeen Abdur & Zhang, Junyan & Yang, Runze, 2022. "Does the financialization of natural resources lead toward sustainability? An application of advance panel Granger non-causality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Hwang, Sun Ho & Kim, Yun Jung, 2018. "Capital mobility in OECD countries: A multi-level factor approach to saving–investment correlations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 150-159.
    8. Yilmaz Bayar & Özlem Yorulmaz & Oğuzhan Yelkesen & Valentin Toader, 2024. "The interaction between ICT penetration and sustainable development: empirical evidence from African countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Mariam Camarero & Juan Sapena & Cecilio Tamarit, 2020. "Modelling Time-Varying Parameters in Panel Data State-Space Frameworks: An Application to the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 87-114, June.
    10. Manuchehr Irandoust, 2019. "Saving and investment causality: implications for financial integration in transition countries of Eastern Europe," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 397-416, April.
    11. Bednarek, Peter & Dinger, Valeriya & Schultz, Alison & von Westernhagen, Natalja, 2023. "Banks of a feather: The informational advantage of being alike," Discussion Papers 09/2023, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    12. Yannick BINEAU, 2010. "A Empirical Assessment of the Feldstein and Horioka Literature," EcoMod2010 259600030, EcoMod.
    13. Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Ramos-Herrera, María del Carmen, 2024. "Does international trade promote economic growth? Europe, 19th and 20th centuries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 561-575.
    14. Kim, Soyoung & Kim, Sunghyun H. & Wang, Yunjong, 2007. "Saving, investment and international capital mobility in East Asia," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 279-291, March.
    15. Apergis, Nicholas & Tsoumas, Chris, 2009. "A survey of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 64-76, June.
    16. Mariam Camarero & Alejandro Muñoz & Cecilio Tamarit, 2021. "50 Years of Capital Mobility in the Eurozone: Breaking the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 867-905, November.
    17. Al-Jahwari, Salim Ahmed Said, 2021. "Does the Twin-Deficits doctrine apply to the Gulf Cooperation Council? A dynamic panel VAR-X model approach," MPRA Paper 111232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Tarlok Singh, 2007. "Intertemporal Optimizing Models Of Trade And Current Account Balance: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 25-64, February.
    19. Samuel Asuamah Yeboah & Boateng Kwadwo Prempeh, 2021. "An econometric modelling of the savings – investments nexus for Ghana," Economic Consultant, Scientific and Educational Initiative LLC, vol. 33(1), pages 40-56.
    20. Ivan D. Trofimov, 2024. "Testing Wagner’s hypothesis using disaggregated data: evidence from a global panel," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 143-171, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:357-:d:1691373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.