IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i12p679-d1807616.html

Volatility Modelling of the JSE Top40 Index: Assessing the GAS Framework Against GARCH and Hybrid GARCH–XGBoost

Author

Listed:
  • Israel Maingo

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa)

  • Thakhani Ravele

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa)

  • Caston Sigauke

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper studies the volatility dynamics of the JSE Top40 Index by estimating a univariate GAS model with time-varying location, scale, and shape parameters (identity score scaling) and comparing its density and point-forecast performance against a stand-alone ARMA(3,2)–EGARCH(1,1) model and a hybrid ARMA(3,2)–EGARCH(1,1)–XGBoost framework. The GAS model is estimated on 3515 daily observations, and several conditional densities are examined. The Student- t GAS model (GAS–STD) obtains the lowest information criteria within the GAS family (AIC = 10,188.142; BIC = 10,243.626) and exhibits statistically significant persistence in location and scale dynamics. Statistical diagnostics provide evidence of correct density calibration (normalised log score = 1.1932; Uniform score = 0.4417), although residual skewness remains (IID-Test skewness p = 0.0134 ). Out-of-sample analysis shows that GAS–STD performs strongly in density and risk forecasting, producing accurate 5% VaR and ES paths and passing coverage backtests (Kupiec LRuc p = 0.8414 ; DQ p = 0.2281 ). However, short-horizon point forecasts are most accurately produced by the Hybrid ARMA(3,2)–EGARCH(1,1)–XGBoost model (RMSE = 0.1386). The full Diebold-Mariano (DM) test confirms that all pairwise differences in predictive accuracy are statistically significant, and the model confidence set (MCS) procedure identifies the Hybrid model as the sole superior model at the 5% significance level, indicating that both ARMA(3,2)–EGARCH(1,1) and GAS–STD are statistically inferior. Simulation experiments illustrate that the tail behaviour of the Student- t distribution is sensitive to the degrees-of-freedom parameter ν . For example, a Student- t distribution with ν = 5 exhibits total kurtosis of approximately 7.32 , indicating heavier tails compared to the Gaussian distribution. Overall, GAS–STD is a strong density and risk model for the JSE Top40, while the hybrid framework excels in short-term volatility forecasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Israel Maingo & Thakhani Ravele & Caston Sigauke, 2025. "Volatility Modelling of the JSE Top40 Index: Assessing the GAS Framework Against GARCH and Hybrid GARCH–XGBoost," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-36, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:679-:d:1807616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/12/679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/12/679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:679-:d:1807616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.