IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i10p562-d1764640.html

Environmental Certifications as Strategic Assets? Evidence from Italian Chemical and Pharmaceutical Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Ruberti

    (Department of Economics, Management and Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Stefano Calciolari

    (Department of Economics, Management and Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Environmental sustainability reporting is increasingly adopted by firms, yet its actual impact on economic performance remains unclear, raising the question of whether such disclosures represent genuine strategic resources or merely symbolic practices. This study examines the relationship between environmental disclosure and economic performance, in the Italian chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Adopting the Resource-Based View (RBV), we evaluate the effectiveness of certified environmental practices as strategic assets that can enhance firm performance. We utilized an AI-based content analysis of financial reports from non-listed, non-SME Italian chemical and pharmaceutical companies between 2012 and 2020 to determine the level of firms’ generic environmental disclosures (without third-party verification) and on specific environmental certifications. We then examine the relationship between economic performance and the type of environmental disclosure observed. Using financial data at the firm level as moderators, we found that generic environmental disclosures have no significant impact on economic performance. In contrast, disclosures on environmental certifications are positively associated with higher economic performance in the chemical sector. Certifications may provide a competitive advantage in environmentally intensive sectors but appear to be less relevant in innovation-driven sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. Our findings emphasize the strategic value of reliable, externally validated environmental practices, and highlight the limitations of symbolic disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Ruberti & Stefano Calciolari, 2025. "Environmental Certifications as Strategic Assets? Evidence from Italian Chemical and Pharmaceutical Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:562-:d:1764640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    2. Parker, Lee D., 2011. "Twenty-one years of social and environmental accountability research: A coming of age," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-10.
    3. Baruch Lev, 2017. "Evaluating Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 29(2), pages 70-75, June.
    4. Begoña Giner Inchausti, 1997. "The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 45-68, May.
    5. Szerena Szabo & Jane Webster, 2021. "Perceived Greenwashing: The Effects of Green Marketing on Environmental and Product Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 719-739, July.
    6. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    7. Lee D. Parker, 2011. "Twenty-one years of social and environmental accountability research: A coming of age," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Blerita Korca & Ericka Costa & Federica Farneti, 2021. "From voluntary to mandatory non-financial disclosure following Directive 2014/95/EU: an Italian case study," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 353-377, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2013. "Socio-environmental reporting trends in the Italian local government: Thrive or wither?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 27-46.
    2. Xuejiao Ma & Xiaojun Ma & Wei Fei & Qichuan Jiang & Yiwei Zhang, 2026. "Stop Where it Should Stop: Board Faultlines, Stakeholder Supervision and Greenwashing Behaviors of Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(2), pages 313-340, January.
    3. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    4. Hu, Xinwen & Hua, Renhai & Liu, Qingfu & Wang, Chuanjie, 2023. "The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Gao, Yuhang & Zhang, Mimi & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Hao, Yan & Wu, Jinghui & Zhang, Lixiao, 2025. "ESG greenwashing behaviour in the electric vehicle supply chain: Insights from evolutionary game theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    6. Waris Ali & Jedrzej George Frynas & Zeeshan Mahmood, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 273-294, July.
    7. Picheng Lee & Gary Kleinman & Asokan Anandarajan, 2025. "The effect of tournament incentives on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 397-408, June.
    8. Jiacai Xiong & Linghong Chen & Yushu Zhu & Thomas Maak, 2026. "Social Trust and Corporate Greenwashing: Insights from China's Pilot Social Credit Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(4), pages 855-883, April.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:9agvf_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    11. D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura & Levantesi, Susanna & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2024. "Measuring business impacts on the sustainability of European-listed firms," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Pei‐Chi Kelly Hsiao & Charl de Villiers & Claire Horner & Hein Oosthuizen, 2022. "A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4453-4483, December.
    13. Monfardini, Patrizio & Barretta, Antonio D. & Ruggiero, Pasquale, 2013. "Seeking legitimacy: Social reporting in the healthcare sector," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 54-66.
    14. Warren Maroun & Andre Prinsloo, 2020. "Drivers of combined assurance in a sustainable development context: Evidence from integrated reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3702-3719, December.
    15. Barros, Victor & Verga Matos, Pedro & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Rino Vieira, Pedro, 2024. "ESG performance and firms’ business and geographical diversification: An empirical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Thuy Thanh Tran & Christian Herzig, 2020. "Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Kamlesh Kukreti & Kunal K. Ganguly, 2025. "Reducing carbon emission through energy efficiency in the telecom sector: Integrating MFCA with ERP systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 2114-2130, December.
    18. Xiaofang Chen & P.R. Weerathunga & Mohammad Nurunnabi & K.M.M.C.B. Kulathunga & W.H.M.S. Samarathunga, 2020. "Influences of Behavioral Intention to Engage in Environmental Accounting Practices for Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    19. Sumit Lodhia, 2019. "What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 309-329, March.
    20. Lueg, Rainer & Radlach, Ronny, 2016. "Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-171.
    21. Dan Dacian Cuzdriorean, 2013. "Most Recent Findings In Earnings Management Area: Interesting Insights From Traditionally Top 5 Leading Accounting Journals," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(15), pages 1-5.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:562-:d:1764640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.