IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i10p536-d1756679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Practices, Corporate Value, and Financial Risk: Is There an Academic Consensus? A Systematic Bibliometric Review

Author

Listed:
  • Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani

    (School of Economics, Business, Accounting and Actuary, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • José Roberto Ferreira Savoia

    (School of Economics, Business, Accounting and Actuary, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Frédéric de Mariz

    (School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Daniel Reed Bergmann

    (School of Economics, Business, Accounting and Actuary, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the relationship between sustainability practices—commonly framed within the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) framework—and both corporate value creation and financial risk mitigation. Our primary objective is to assess how ESG initiatives affect firm outcomes, with particular emphasis on risk reduction, a dimension less explored in the economic and financial literature. The search was conducted in the Web of Science database on 15 June 2024, using the keywords “ESG and Financial Risk” and “ESG and Valuation,” yielding 1074 initial records. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we analyzed the final sample through descriptive and frequency-based methods. Findings reveal no clear consensus on the connection between ESG and value creation, with results varying across sectors, firm sizes, regions, and specific ESG components. In contrast, the evidence supporting the link between ESG practices and financial risk mitigation is stronger: 68% of the reviewed studies reported a positive relationship, while only 5% found negative effects. This review underscores the potential of sustainability as a risk-management mechanism and highlights research gaps that warrant deeper exploration. Limitations include heterogeneity of methodologies, metrics, and contexts among the studies reviewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani & José Roberto Ferreira Savoia & Frédéric de Mariz & Daniel Reed Bergmann, 2025. "Sustainability Practices, Corporate Value, and Financial Risk: Is There an Academic Consensus? A Systematic Bibliometric Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:536-:d:1756679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/536/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/536/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:536-:d:1756679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.