IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i3p172-d1747105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Philosophy of Financial Performance: A Bibliometric and Conceptual Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela Munteanu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    Faculty of Economic Studies, Ovidius University of Constanta, Aleea Universitatii No.1, 900470 Constanta, Romania)

  • Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă

    (Department of Accounting, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bogdan Ștefan Ionescu

    (Department of Accounting, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandra-Maria Spânu

    (Doctoral School of Business Administration, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania)

  • Mircea Iosif Rus

    (National Institute for Research-Development in Construction, Urbanism and Sustainable Territorial Development “URBAN INCERC”, 117 Calea Floresti, 400524 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Financial performance research has increasingly intersected with philosophical debates on ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder value, yet a clear framework linking these perspectives to actionable financial metrics remains underdeveloped. This study aims to explore how philosophical perspectives (normative, epistemological, and behavioral) inform the evolving concept of financial performance, using bibliometric and science mapping techniques to analyze key research trends from 2006 to 2023. The analysis identifies four dominant thematic areas: corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational performance, ethical governance, and circular economy innovation. We synthesize these into a practical framework that connects each theme to measurable financial indicators, enabling managers to refine capital allocation, investors to incorporate non-financial drivers into valuation models, and policymakers to design sustainability reporting standards that integrate both economic and ethical considerations. By bridging philosophical insights and financial decision-making tools, this study contributes to both the theoretical development and applied practice of performance assessment in finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela Munteanu & Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă & Bogdan Ștefan Ionescu & Alexandra-Maria Spânu & Mircea Iosif Rus, 2025. "The Philosophy of Financial Performance: A Bibliometric and Conceptual Review," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:172-:d:1747105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelle de Boer, 2024. "Interpersonal comparisons of well-being: Increasing convergence," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 321-345, November.
    2. Garth Heutel, 2024. "Behavioral economics and the evidential defense of welfare economics," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 368-384, November.
    3. Antonio Chamorro & Tomás M. Bañegil, 2006. "Green marketing philosophy: a study of Spanish firms with ecolabels," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 11-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Firnkorn & Martin Müller, 2012. "Selling Mobility instead of Cars: New Business Strategies of Automakers and the Impact on Private Vehicle Holding," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 264-280, May.
    2. Youtang Zhang & Hagos Mesfin Berhe, 2022. "The Impact of Green Investment and Green Marketing on Business Performance: The Mediation Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia’s Chinese Textile Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Lorenzo Gelmini & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi & Maurizio Comoli, 2021. "Rhetoric, Accounting and Accountability: COVID-19 and the Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. F. Testa & F. Iraldo & A Vaccari & E. Ferrari, 2015. "Why Eco‐labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian Consumers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 252-265, May.
    5. Paul Ziek, 2009. "Making sense of CSR communication," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 137-145, May.
    6. Rüdiger Hahn, 2013. "ISO 26000 and the Standardization of Strategic Management Processes for Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 442-455, November.
    7. Muhammad Mohsin Butt & Saadia Mushtaq & Alia Afzal & Kok Wei Khong & Fon Sim Ong & Pui Fong Ng, 2017. "Integrating Behavioural and Branding Perspectives to Maximize Green Brand Equity: A Holistic Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 507-520, May.
    8. Seongho Kang & Won‐Moo Hur, 2012. "Investigating the Antecedents of Green Brand Equity: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 306-316, September.
    9. Vinod Kumar & Zillur Rahman & A.A. Kazmi, 2013. "Sustainability Marketing Strategy: An Analysis of Recent Literature," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(4), pages 601-625, December.
    10. Esmaeilpour Majid & Bahmiary Elahe, 2017. "Investigating the impact of environmental attitude on the decision to purchase a green product with the mediating role of environmental concern and care for green products," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 297-315, June.
    11. Paulina Rutecka & Karina Cicha & Mariia Rizun & Artur Strzelecki, 2025. "Polish tourist facilities' engagement in the communication of the low-emission activities and sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3827-3853, February.
    12. Stephanie Anne Nicole Bedard & Carri Reisdorf Tolmie, 2018. "Millennials' green consumption behaviour: Exploring the role of social media," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1388-1396, November.
    13. Vilkaite-Vaitone Neringa & Skackauskiene Ilona, 2019. "Green marketing orientation: evolution, conceptualization and potential benefits," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 53-62, January.
    14. Radu Ciobanu & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Luciana-Floriana Holostencu & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu, 2022. "Decision-Making Factors in the Purchase of Ecologic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.
    15. Elena Fraj‐Andrés & Eva Martínez‐Salinas & Jorge Matute‐Vallejo, 2009. "Factors affecting corporate environmental strategy in Spanish industrial firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(8), pages 500-514, December.
    16. Agarwal, Neha Dhruv & Kumar, V.V. Ravi & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2024. "Leveraging social media to examine sustainability communication of home appliance brands," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:172-:d:1747105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.