IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i5p1971-1983d17891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models to Incorporate Chemical and Non-Chemical Stressors into Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Pesticide Exposures

Author

Listed:
  • Susan C. Wason

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 401 Park Drive West, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Thomas J. Smith

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 401 Park Drive West, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Melissa J. Perry

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 401 Park Drive West, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Health Service, George Washington University, 2300 Eye St. NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA)

  • Jonathan I. Levy

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 401 Park Drive West, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA)

Abstract

Cumulative risk assessment has been proposed as an approach to evaluate the health risks associated with simultaneous exposure to multiple chemical and non-chemical stressors. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) models can allow for the inclusion and evaluation of multiple stressors, including non-chemical stressors, but studies have not leveraged PBPK/PD models to jointly consider these disparate exposures in a cumulative risk context. In this study, we focused on exposures to organophosphate (OP) pesticides for children in urban low-income environments, where these children would be simultaneously exposed to other pesticides (including pyrethroids) and non-chemical stressors that may modify the effects of these exposures (including diet). We developed a methodological framework to evaluate chemical and non-chemical stressor impacts on OPs, utilizing an existing PBPK/PD model for chlorpyrifos. We evaluated population-specific stressors that would influence OP doses or acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, the relevant PD outcome. We incorporated the impact of simultaneous exposure to pyrethroids and dietary factors on OP dose through the compartments of metabolism and PD outcome within the PBPK model, and simulated combinations of stressors across multiple exposure ranges and potential body weights. Our analyses demonstrated that both chemical and non-chemical stressors can influence the health implications of OP exposures, with up to 5-fold variability in AChE inhibition across combinations of stressor values for a given OP dose. We demonstrate an approach for modeling OP risks in the presence of other population-specific environmental stressors, providing insight about co-exposures and variability factors that most impact OP health risks and contribute to children’s cumulative health risk from pesticides. More generally, this framework can be used to inform cumulative risk assessment for any compound impacted by chemical and non-chemical stressors through metabolism or PD outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan C. Wason & Thomas J. Smith & Melissa J. Perry & Jonathan I. Levy, 2012. "Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models to Incorporate Chemical and Non-Chemical Stressors into Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Pesticide Exposures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:5:p:1971-1983:d:17891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/5/1971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/5/1971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Mei Tan & Harvey Clewell & Jerry Campbell & Melvin Andersen, 2011. "Evaluating Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions with Computational Models in Supporting Cumulative Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Jonathan I. Levy, 2008. "Is Epidemiology the Key to Cumulative Risk Assessment?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1507-1513, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ari S. Lewis & Sonja N. Sax & Susan C. Wason & Sharan L. Campleman, 2011. "Non-Chemical Stressors and Cumulative Risk Assessment: An Overview of Current Initiatives and Potential Air Pollutant Interactions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-54, June.
    2. Steffen Andreas Schüle & Gabriele Bolte, 2015. "Interactive and Independent Associations between the Socioeconomic and Objective Built Environment on the Neighbourhood Level and Individual Health: A Systematic Review of Multilevel Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Ramya Chari & Thomas A. Burke & Ronald H. White & Mary A. Fox, 2012. "Integrating Susceptibility into Environmental Policy: An Analysis of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Lead," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Margaret M. MacDonell & Richard C. Hertzberg & Glenn E. Rice & J. Michael Wright & Linda K. Teuschler, 2018. "Characterizing Risk for Cumulative Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1183-1201, June.
    5. Mary A. Fox & L. Elizabeth Brewer & Lawrence Martin, 2017. "An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007–2016)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Jonathan I. Levy & M. Patricia Fabian & Junenette L. Peters, 2015. "Meta‐Analytic Approaches for Multistressor Dose‐Response Function Development: Strengths, Limitations, and Case Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1040-1049, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:5:p:1971-1983:d:17891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.