IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v8y2011i9p3628-3636d13867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoking, Cognitive Function and Mortality in a U.S. National Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Richard F. Gillum

    (Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, Howard University, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Washington, DC 20060, USA)

  • John Kwagyan

    (Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Washington, DC 20060, USA)

  • Thomas O. Obisesan

    (Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, Howard University, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Washington, DC 20060, USA
    Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Washington, DC 20060, USA)

Abstract

Previous studies report that low levels cognitive function and history of smoking are associated with increased mortality risk. Elderly smokers may have increased risk of dementia, but risk in former smokers is unclear. We tested the hypotheses that the harmful effect of impaired cognitive function as related to mortality is greater in persons smoking at baseline than in others. Further, we used serum cotinine levels to assess recall bias of smoking history by cognitive function level. Data were analyzed from a longitudinal mortality follow-up study of 4,916 American men and women aged 60 years and over, examined in 1988–1994 with complete data followed an average 8.5 years. Measurements at baseline included smoking history, a short index of cognitive function (SICF), serum cotinine and socio-demographics. Death during follow-up occurred in 1,919 persons. In proportional hazards regression analysis, a significant interaction of current smoking with cognitive function was not found; but there was a significant age-smoking interaction. After adjusting for confounding by age or multiple variables, current smoking associated with over 2-fold increased mortality (hazards ratio and 95% confidence limits current versus never smoking 2.13, 1.75–2.59) and SICF with 32% reduction in mortality; top versus bottom SICF stratum 0.68, 0.53–0.88). Serum cotinine data revealed substantial recall bias of smoking history in persons with cognitive impairment. However analyses correcting for this bias did not alter the main conclusions: In a nationwide cohort of older Americans, analyses demonstrated a lower risk of death independent of confounders among those with high SICF scores and never smokers, without a significant interaction of the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard F. Gillum & John Kwagyan & Thomas O. Obisesan, 2011. "Smoking, Cognitive Function and Mortality in a U.S. National Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:9:p:3628-3636:d:13867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/9/3628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/9/3628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, W. & Kim, Y. & Boudreau, N., 2001. "Association of smoking with serum and dietary levels of antioxidants in adults: NHANES III, 1988-1994," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(2), pages 258-264.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:9:p:3628-3636:d:13867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.