IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v6y2009i5p1691-1705d5066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas E. Novotny

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
    Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92186, USA)

  • Kristen Lum

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA)

  • Elizabeth Smith

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA)

  • Vivian Wang

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA)

  • Richard Barnes

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA)

Abstract

Discarded cigarette butts are a form of non-biodegradable litter. Carried as runoff from streets to drains, to rivers, and ultimately to the ocean and its beaches, cigarette filters are the single most collected item in international beach cleanups each year. They are an environmental blight on streets, sidewalks, and other open areas. Rather than being a protective health device, cigarette filters are primarily a marketing tool to help sell ‘safe’ cigarettes. They are perceived by much of the public (especially current smokers) to reduce the health risks of smoking through technology. Filters have reduced the machine-measured yield of tar and nicotine from burning cigarettes, but there is controversy as to whether this has correspondingly reduced the disease burden of smoking to the population. Filters actually may serve to sustain smoking by making it seem less urgent for smokers to quit and easier for children to initiate smoking because of reduced irritation from early experimentation. Several options are available to reduce the environmental impact of cigarette butt waste, including developing biodegradable filters, increasing fines and penalties for littering butts, monetary deposits on filters, increasing availability of butt receptacles, and expanded public education. It may even be possible to ban the sale of filtered cigarettes altogether on the basis of their adverse environmental impact. This option may be attractive in coastal regions where beaches accumulate butt waste and where smoking indoors is increasingly prohibited. Additional research is needed on the various policy options, including behavioral research on the impact of banning the sale of filtered cigarettes altogether.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas E. Novotny & Kristen Lum & Elizabeth Smith & Vivian Wang & Richard Barnes, 2009. "Cigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:6:y:2009:i:5:p:1691-1705:d:5066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/6/5/1691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/6/5/1691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula Stigler Granados & Lawrence Fulton & Evangelina Nunez Patlan & Mischa Terzyk & Thomas E. Novotny, 2019. "Global Health Perspectives on Cigarette Butts and the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Maria Christina B. Araújo & Monica F. Costa, 2019. "From Plant to Waste: The Long and Diverse Impact Chain Caused by Tobacco Smoking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Thomas Webler & Karin Jakubowski, 2022. "Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors about Cigarette-Butt Littering among College-Aged Adults in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. John E. Schneider & Cara M. Scheibling & N. Andrew Peterson & Paula Stigler Granados & Lawrence Fulton & Thomas E. Novotny, 2020. "Online Simulation Model to Estimate the Total Costs of Tobacco Product Waste in Large U.S. Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Sanas Javadian & Paula Stigler-Granados & Clifton Curtis & Francis Thompson & Laurent Huber & Thomas E. Novotny, 2015. "Perspectives on Tobacco Product Waste: A Survey of Framework Convention Alliance Members’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Jessica M. Rath & Rebecca A. Rubenstein & Laurel E. Curry & Sarah E. Shank & Julia C. Cartwright, 2012. "Cigarette Litter: Smokers’ Attitudes and Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:6:y:2009:i:5:p:1691-1705:d:5066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.