Author
Listed:
- Giovanna Soutinho Araújo
(Postgraduate Program in Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition—NESNUT, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil
Department of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade do Distrito Federal Professor Jorge Amaury Maia Nunes (UnDF), Brasília 71503-502, DF, Brazil)
- Vivian S. S. Gonçalves
(Graduate Program in Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)
- Ariene Silva do Carmo
(Postgraduate Program in Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition—NESNUT, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)
- Maurício T. L. de Vasconcellos
(Sociedade para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa Científica—SCIENCE, Rio de Janeiro 20231-050, RJ, Brazil)
- Natacha Toral
(Postgraduate Program in Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition—NESNUT, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)
Abstract
This descriptive ecological study evaluated the food environment of 18 public and private schools in the Federal District (DF), Brazil, by analyzing food availability within schools and in their surroundings (250 m, 400 m, and 800 m buffers). Food retail outlets (FROs) were georeferenced and classified according to the NOVA food classification. School principals were interviewed to assess the in-school food environment. Analyses considered the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI; low or medium/high) and school type. Among 911 FROs identified, 40.2% predominantly sold ultra-processed products. Most schools (83.3% within a 250 m radius) had at least one nearby FRO. Private schools—mostly in low-SVI areas—had higher densities of surrounding FROs at all buffer distances, with significance for total density at 400 m ( p = 0.03) and for unhealthy outlets at 800 m ( p < 0.01). Low-SVI areas had higher densities of both healthy ( p = 0.01) and unhealthy ( p < 0.01) outlets, with differences across multiple buffers. In canteens, sugar-sweetened beverages were the most common ultra-processed items (75%). The median ratio of ultra-processed to minimally processed food subgroups was 2.7 (0.5–6.0), and all private schools with a canteen sold at least one item prohibited by current regulations. Overall, the DF school food environment was characterized by a predominance of unhealthy foods, with disparities by school type and social vulnerability.
Suggested Citation
Giovanna Soutinho Araújo & Vivian S. S. Gonçalves & Ariene Silva do Carmo & Maurício T. L. de Vasconcellos & Natacha Toral, 2025.
"What Is There to Buy? An Analysis of the Food Environment in Public and Private Schools in the Federal District,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-19, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1331-:d:1733206
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1331-:d:1733206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.