IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p940-d1679781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risky Play Is Not a Dirty Word: A Tool to Measure Benefit–Risk in Outdoor Playgrounds and Educational Settings

Author

Listed:
  • David Eager

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Tonia Gray

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
    World Leisure Centre for Excellence, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Helen Little

    (Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Wallumattagal Campus, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Fiona Robbé

    (Architects of Arcadia, 108 Arcadia Road, Arcadia, NSW 2159, Australia)

  • Lisa N. Sharwood

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
    School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia)

Abstract

Challenge, adventure, and risky play have repeatedly been found to be learning environments that positively shape childhood well-being and development. Extant evidence-based research conveys the physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional growth associated with risky play provision. However, understanding the interplay of risky play, injury, and safety is more nuanced and complex. The goal of this paper is to introduce a tool which allows educators, parents, health practitioners, urban planners, playground designers, certifiers, manufacturers, and inspectors to estimate both the benefit and risk of outdoor play and learning settings, such as playgrounds, adventure parks, or risk-taking activities. One of the key challenges associated with societal risk appetite or risk tolerance has been the inability to quantify the inherent benefits of risk taking in playgrounds and educational settings. Historically, the assessment of ‘benefit–risk’ has been dominated by a zero tolerance of incidents, whether in the workplace or road safety settings. Against this backdrop, if playgrounds and outdoor learning settings are boring, children will go elsewhere to seek thrills and adventure, which may often be manifested in antisocial behaviour. In 2023, ‘benefit–risk’ was formally recognised in the area of sport and recreation by the International Organisation for Standardisation, when it published the ISO 4980:2023 benefit–risk assessment for sport and recreational facilities, activities, and equipment. ISO 4980:2023 is a departure from the traditional view of risk management, in that it presents a perspective of risk which is not limited to framing risk as negative, but rather balances the calculation of positive benefits as well as the risks associated with the activity. Correspondingly, hazardous situations which have zero benefit should be eliminated or mitigated. The tool introduced in this paper offers playground inspectors and educators the ability to measure and assess both the benefit and risk of outdoor playgrounds and educational settings where children play, learn, and flourish.

Suggested Citation

  • David Eager & Tonia Gray & Helen Little & Fiona Robbé & Lisa N. Sharwood, 2025. "Risky Play Is Not a Dirty Word: A Tool to Measure Benefit–Risk in Outdoor Playgrounds and Educational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:940-:d:1679781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:940-:d:1679781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.