IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p940-d1679781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risky Play Is Not a Dirty Word: A Tool to Measure Benefit–Risk in Outdoor Playgrounds and Educational Settings

Author

Listed:
  • David Eager

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Tonia Gray

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
    World Leisure Centre for Excellence, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Helen Little

    (Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Wallumattagal Campus, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Fiona Robbé

    (Architects of Arcadia, 108 Arcadia Road, Arcadia, NSW 2159, Australia)

  • Lisa N. Sharwood

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
    School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia)

Abstract

Challenge, adventure, and risky play have repeatedly been found to be learning environments that positively shape childhood well-being and development. Extant evidence-based research conveys the physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional growth associated with risky play provision. However, understanding the interplay of risky play, injury, and safety is more nuanced and complex. The goal of this paper is to introduce a tool which allows educators, parents, health practitioners, urban planners, playground designers, certifiers, manufacturers, and inspectors to estimate both the benefit and risk of outdoor play and learning settings, such as playgrounds, adventure parks, or risk-taking activities. One of the key challenges associated with societal risk appetite or risk tolerance has been the inability to quantify the inherent benefits of risk taking in playgrounds and educational settings. Historically, the assessment of ‘benefit–risk’ has been dominated by a zero tolerance of incidents, whether in the workplace or road safety settings. Against this backdrop, if playgrounds and outdoor learning settings are boring, children will go elsewhere to seek thrills and adventure, which may often be manifested in antisocial behaviour. In 2023, ‘benefit–risk’ was formally recognised in the area of sport and recreation by the International Organisation for Standardisation, when it published the ISO 4980:2023 benefit–risk assessment for sport and recreational facilities, activities, and equipment. ISO 4980:2023 is a departure from the traditional view of risk management, in that it presents a perspective of risk which is not limited to framing risk as negative, but rather balances the calculation of positive benefits as well as the risks associated with the activity. Correspondingly, hazardous situations which have zero benefit should be eliminated or mitigated. The tool introduced in this paper offers playground inspectors and educators the ability to measure and assess both the benefit and risk of outdoor playgrounds and educational settings where children play, learn, and flourish.

Suggested Citation

  • David Eager & Tonia Gray & Helen Little & Fiona Robbé & Lisa N. Sharwood, 2025. "Risky Play Is Not a Dirty Word: A Tool to Measure Benefit–Risk in Outdoor Playgrounds and Educational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:940-:d:1679781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Brussoni & Rebecca Gibbons & Casey Gray & Takuro Ishikawa & Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter & Adam Bienenstock & Guylaine Chabot & Pamela Fuselli & Susan Herrington & Ian Janssen & William Picket, 2015. "What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0229006 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janet Loebach & Adina Cox, 2020. "Tool for Observing Play Outdoors (TOPO): A New Typology for Capturing Children’s Play Behaviors in Outdoor Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Janet Loebach & Marcos Sanches & Julia Jaffe & Tara Elton-Marshall, 2021. "Paving the Way for Outdoor Play: Examining Socio-Environmental Barriers to Community-Based Outdoor Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Emma Ostermeier & Patricia Tucker & Andrew Clark & Jamie A. Seabrook & Jason Gilliland, 2021. "Parents’ Report of Canadian Elementary School Children’s Physical Activity and Screen Time during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Natsuko Imai & Akiko Shikano & Tetsuhiro Kidokoro & Shingo Noi, 2022. "Risky Play and Social Behaviors among Japanese Preschoolers: Direct Observation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Junjie Liu & Shirley Wyver & Muhammad Chutiyami & Helen Little, 2023. "Outdoor Time, Space, and Restrictions Imposed on Children’s Play in Australian Early Childhood Education and Care Settings during the COVID Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from Educators’ Perspecti," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Martin van Rooijen & Kristine De Martelaer & Gerty Lensvelt-Mulders & Lisette van der Poel & Mieke Cotterink, 2023. "“It Is Scary, but Then I Just Do It Anyway”: Children’s Experiences and Concerns about Risk and Challenge during Loose Parts Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Boris Jidovtseff & Florence Pirard & Anne Martin & Paul McCrorie & Andora Vidal & Elodie Pools, 2022. "Parental Assessment of Benefits and of Dangers Determines Children’s Permission to Play Outdoors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Qiang Wang & Jiameng Ma & Akira Maehashi & Hyunshik Kim, 2020. "The Associations between Outdoor Playtime, Screen-Viewing Time, and Environmental Factors in Chinese Young Children: The “Eat, Be Active and Sleep Well” Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Òscar Flores & Anabel Ramos-Pla & Isabel del Arco, 2022. "The Management of Safety Situations and Assumable Risk during Transitions and Recesses in Different Types of Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Jeff Mann & Tonia Gray & Son Truong & Pasi Sahlberg & Peter Bentsen & Rowena Passy & Susanna Ho & Kumara Ward & Rachel Cowper, 2021. "A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Efficacy of Nature-Based Learning in Outdoor Educational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Mark S. Tremblay & Casey Gray & Shawna Babcock & Joel Barnes & Christa Costas Bradstreet & Dawn Carr & Guylaine Chabot & Louise Choquette & David Chorney & Cam Collyer & Susan Herrington & Katherine J, 2015. "Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Sarah Little & Art Rice, 2021. "Considering Autonomous Exploration in Healthy Environments: Reflections from an Urban Wildscape," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Josephine Y. Chau & Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani & Helen Little, 2023. "Navigating Neighbourhood Opposition and Climate Change: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Play Street Pilot in Sydney, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    14. Amalie Lambert & Janae Vlaar & Susan Herrington & Mariana Brussoni, 2019. "What Is the Relationship between the Neighbourhood Built Environment and Time Spent in Outdoor Play? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-35, October.
    15. Patricia Grady-Dominguez & Jo Ragen & Julia Sterman & Grace Spencer & Paul Tranter & Michelle Villeneuve & Anita Bundy, 2021. "Expectations and Assumptions: Examining the Influence of Staff Culture on a Novel School-Based Intervention to Enable Risky Play for Children with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Steph Scott & Tonia Gray & Jenna Charlton & Sharon Millard, 2022. "The Impact of Time Spent in Natural Outdoor Spaces on Children’s Language, Communication and Social Skills: A Systematic Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Wenqi Lin & Jianfen Wu & Yunpeng Wu & Hongli He, 2022. "Development of Teacher Rating Scale of Risky Play for 3- to 6-Year-Old Pre-Schoolers in Anji Play Kindergartens of East China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Avril Johnstone & Anne Martin & Rita Cordovil & Ingunn Fjørtoft & Susanna Iivonen & Boris Jidovtseff & Frederico Lopes & John J. Reilly & Hilary Thomson & Valerie Wells & Paul McCrorie, 2022. "Nature-Based Early Childhood Education and Children’s Social, Emotional and Cognitive Development: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Fiona Armstrong & Michael Joseph Barrett & David Gaul & Lorraine D’Arcy, 2025. "Parental Attitudes to Risky Play and Children’s Independent Mobility: Public Health Implications for Children in Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Janet Loebach & Adina Cox, 2022. "Playing in ‘ The Backyard ’: Environmental Features and Conditions of a Natural Playspace Which Support Diverse Outdoor Play Activities among Younger Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-35, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:940-:d:1679781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.