IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i4p631-d1636591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Safety in Informal Markets: How Knowledge and Attitudes Influence Vendor Practices in Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Winnie L. N. Sheehama

    (Department of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2038, Gauteng, South Africa)

  • Tanusha Singh

    (Department of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2038, Gauteng, South Africa)

Abstract

Background : Informal markets are essential to ensuring food accessibility and supporting economic livelihoods throughout sub-Saharan Africa; however, food safety in these settings remains poorly regulated and under-resourced. As such, foodborne illnesses originating from such settings pose serious public health threats. Despite the growing reliance on ready-to-eat street foods in Namibia, little is known about the food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of food handlers in informal settings. This study investigated food handlers’ KAP regarding food safety at the Oshakati Mini Market, northern Namibia, to inform environmental health practitioners and guide policymakers in improving food safety measures. Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted with 103 food handlers using a self-administered questionnaire which assessed sociodemographic characteristics, food safety knowledge (15 items), attitudes (10 items), and practices (12 items). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression to identify associations between KAP scores and respondent characteristics. Results : The majority of respondents were female (60.2%), aged 30–49 years (69.0%), and had only primary-level education. Only 15.5% had received formal food safety training. The mean knowledge score was 64.7% (SD = 14.2), and the mean practice score was 58.2% (SD = 13.8). Attitudes were predominantly negative (60.2%), despite 95.1% acknowledging the importance of handwashing. Poor practices included low use of protective clothing (28.2%), smoking in food areas (21.4%), and inadequate utensil hygiene. Knowledge was positively correlated with good practices (r = 0.745, p < 0.01), while attitudes were negatively correlated with good practices (r = −0.745, p < 0.01). Regression analysis revealed that age negatively influenced knowledge (β = −0.265, p < 0.01), while work experience positively predicted both knowledge (β = 0.393, p < 0.01) and practices (β = 0.393, p < 0.01). Conclusions : Food handlers in Oshakati’s informal market exhibited moderate knowledge but sub-optimal food safety practices and largely negative attitudes. Limited training and education were key contributing factors. These findings highlight an urgent need for structured, context-specific food safety training and regulatory enforcement to reduce foodborne disease risk and strengthen public health interventions in Namibia’s informal food economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Winnie L. N. Sheehama & Tanusha Singh, 2025. "Food Safety in Informal Markets: How Knowledge and Attitudes Influence Vendor Practices in Namibia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:631-:d:1636591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:631-:d:1636591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.