IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i8p5560-d1125993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Distress in Oncology: A Descriptive Study of Healthcare Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Lara Guariglia

    (Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Irene Terrenato

    (Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Laura Iacorossi

    (Nursing Research Unit IFO, IRCCS Regina Elena, National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Giovanna D’Antonio

    (Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Sonia Ieraci

    (Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefania Torelli

    (Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Fabiola Nazzicone

    (Nursing, Technical, Rehabilitation, Assistance, and Research Direction IFO, IRCCS Regina Elena, National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Petrone

    (Nursing, Technical, Rehabilitation, Assistance, and Research Direction IFO, IRCCS Regina Elena, National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Anita Caruso

    (Psychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The oncology setting is characterized by various complexities, and healthcare professionals may experience stressful conditions associated with ethical decisions during daily clinical practice. Moral distress (MD) is a condition of distress that is generated when an individual would like to take action in line with their ethical beliefs but in conflict with the healthcare facility’s customs and/or organization. This study aims to describe the MD of oncology health professionals in different care settings. Methods: Descriptive quantitative study was conducted in the Operating Units of the Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri in Rome between January and March 2022. The investigated sample consisted of the medical and nursing staff on duty at the facility, who were given a questionnaire through a web survey. Besides a brief sociodemographic form, the MD Scale-Revised questionnaire was used for data collection. Results: The sample consisted of nurses (51%) and physicians (49%), predominantly working in surgeries (48%), and having 20–30 years of service (30%). MD was higher among healthcare professionals, in medicine than that ing in corporate organizations, surgeries, or outpatient clinics ( p = 0.007). It was not related to the profession ( p = 0.163), gender ( p = 0.103), or years of service ( p = 0.610). Conclusions: This paper outlines the prevalence of MD in care settings and describes its relationship with profession, gender, and seniority. There is no patient care without the care of health professionals: knowing and fighting MD improves the safety of the treatments provided and the quality perceived by patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara Guariglia & Irene Terrenato & Laura Iacorossi & Giovanna D’Antonio & Sonia Ieraci & Stefania Torelli & Fabiola Nazzicone & Fabrizio Petrone & Anita Caruso, 2023. "Moral Distress in Oncology: A Descriptive Study of Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5560-:d:1125993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnetz, Bengt B., 2001. "Psychosocial challenges facing physicians of today," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 203-213, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wallace, Jean Elizabeth & Lemaire, Jane, 2007. "On physician well being--You'll get by with a little help from your friends," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 2565-2577, June.
    2. Ferda Erdem & Murat Atalay, 2017. "The effect of health transformation policies on the resident physicians' perception of the medical profession in Turkey," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 189-216, April.
    3. Hyde, Martin & Jappinen, Paavo & Theorell, Tores & Oxenstierna, Gabriel, 2006. "Workplace conflict resolution and the health of employees in the Swedish and Finnish units of an industrial company," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2218-2227, October.
    4. Abdurrahim Emhan & Safa Elkefi & Onur Asan, 2022. "Predictors of Healthcare Professionals’ Work Difficulty Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study of Work Environment in a Pandemic Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    5. Dobson, Roy Thomas & Lepnurm, Rein & Struening, Elmer, 2005. "Developing a scale for measuring professional equity among Canadian physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 263-266, July.
    6. Li, Jian & Yang, Wenjie & Cho, Sung-il, 2006. "Gender differences in job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and health functioning among Chinese physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 1066-1077, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5560-:d:1125993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.