IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4753-d1090803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Repeated Viewings in Forest Landscapes Influence Young People’s Visual Behaviors and Cognitive Evaluations?

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyun Wu

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Yu Gao

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Zhi Zhang

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (Shenyang Construction Engineering Project Management Center Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110032, China)

  • Huan Meng

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Weikang Zhang

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Tong Zhang

    (Landscape Planning Laboratory, Forestry College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

Abstract

Background: With the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, it has gradually become normal to periodically visit and enjoy forest landscape resources in the suburbs of cities. For designers and managers of forest landscapes, exploring change in the visual behaviors and cognitive evaluations of people who repeatedly view forest landscapes and the characteristics of this change will aid the design and sustainable utilization of forest landscape resources in the suburbs of cities. Purpose: From the perspective of users’ preferences for forest landscape space, this study explored the changes in visual behavior characteristics and psychological preference characteristics for individuals who repeatedly view forest landscapes and their drivers under different preferences. Methods: This study collected data from 52 graduate and undergraduate students. We used a difference test to compare the differences in the visual behavior coincidence degree and the changes in psychological evaluations; a descriptive statistical analysis to explore young peoples’ likes and dislikes of landscape elements; and Spearman correlation analysis to explore the correlation between the psychological evaluations and visual behaviors. Main results: 1. At the second viewing, the participants’ regression behavior tended to decrease for various spaces, and they were more inclined to view areas that they had not viewed before. In addition, at the second viewing, the degree of fixation behavior coincidence was generally low, and there were obvious differences across spaces; 2. The participants’ feature evaluations and comprehensive evaluations for landscapes did not change significantly with their increased familiarity with the spaces; 3. There was a significant positive correlation between the participants’ psychological evaluations of landscape stimuli and the degree of fixation coincidence when viewing the spaces, among which the rate of distant clarity and the degree of fixation behavior coincidence were significantly and positively correlated. Meanwhile, at the second viewing, the number of favorite elements in the lookout space, which belongs to high-preference spaces, noticeably increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyun Wu & Yu Gao & Zhi Zhang & Bo Zhang & Huan Meng & Weikang Zhang & Tong Zhang, 2023. "How Do Repeated Viewings in Forest Landscapes Influence Young People’s Visual Behaviors and Cognitive Evaluations?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4753-:d:1090803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelley Burgin & Nigel Hardiman, 2012. "Extreme sports in natural areas: looming disaster or a catalyst for a paradigm shift in land use planning?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 921-940, October.
    2. Margaret M. Hansen & Reo Jones & Kirsten Tocchini, 2017. "Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) and Nature Therapy: A State-of-the-Art Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-48, July.
    3. Helena Nordh & Caroline M. Hagerhall & Kenneth Holmqvist, 2013. "Tracking Restorative Components: Patterns in Eye Movements as a Consequence of a Restorative Rating Task," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 101-116, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ka-Yin Yau & Pui-Sze Law & Chung-Ngok Wong, 2022. "Cardiac and Mental Benefits of Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) Diet plus Forest Bathing (FB) versus MIND Diet among Older Chinese Adults: A Randomized Controlled Pil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Ivana Bassi & Vanessa Deotto & Laura Pagani & Luca Iseppi, 2024. "Forest Therapy as an Alternative and Sustainable Rehabilitation Practice: A Patient Group Attitude Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Suling Guo & Wei Sun & Wen Chen & Jianxin Zhang & Peixue Liu, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. John Kavanaugh & Mark E. Hardison & Heidi Honegger Rogers & Crystal White & Jessica Gross, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of a Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) Intervention on Physician/Healthcare Professional Burnout: A Randomized, Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Rafael Luchoro-Parrilla & Pere Lavega-Burgués & Miguel Pic, 2024. "Teaching Sustainability through Traditional Sporting Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Chang Li & Yu Yuan & Changan Sun & Minkai Sun, 2022. "The Perceived Restorative Quality of Viewing Various Types of Urban and Rural Scenes: Based on Psychological and Physiological Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Hyeyun Kim & Yong Won Lee & Hyo Jin Ju & Bong Jin Jang & Yeong In Kim, 2019. "An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Forest Therapy on Sleep Quality in Patients with Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-7, July.
    8. Alexandra Jiricka-Pürrer & Valeria Tadini & Boris Salak & Karolina Taczanowska & Andrzej Tucki & Giulio Senes, 2019. "Do Protected Areas Contribute to Health and Well-Being? A Cross-Cultural Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Hyeyun Kim & Jayoung Kim & Hyo Jin Ju & Bong Jin Jang & Tae Kyu Wang & Yeong In Kim, 2020. "Effect of Forest Therapy for Menopausal Women with Insomnia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-8, September.
    10. Chorong Song & Harumi Ikei & Yoshifumi Miyazaki, 2018. "Physiological Effects of Visual Stimulation with Forest Imagery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Yu Wu & Zhixiong Zhuo & Qunyue Liu & Kunyong Yu & Qitang Huang & Jian Liu, 2021. "The Relationships between Perceived Design Intensity, Preference, Restorativeness and Eye Movements in Designed Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Hyeonjin Song & Kevin James Lane & Honghyok Kim & Hyomi Kim & Garam Byun & Minh Le & Yongsoo Choi & Chan Ryul Park & Jong-Tae Lee, 2019. "Association between Urban Greenness and Depressive Symptoms: Evaluation of Greenness Using Various Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Ernest Bielinis & Jenni Simkin & Pasi Puttonen & Liisa Tyrväinen, 2020. "Effect of Viewing Video Representation of the Urban Environment and Forest Environment on Mood and Level of Procrastination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Yao Sun & Yunhe Ding & Miaoyi Lei & Liang Mao, 2024. "Restoration Evaluation of National Forest Park in Greater Khingan Mountains Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee & Ludvig, Alice & Hogl, Karl, 2020. "Innovation development in forest ecosystem services: A comparative mountain bike trail study from Austria and Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Sujin Park & Eunsoo Kim & Geonwoo Kim & Soojin Kim & Yeji Choi & Domyung Paek, 2022. "What Activities in Forests Are Beneficial for Human Health? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-29, February.
    17. Katherine Carron & Elena Lioubimtseva, 2025. "Ethics as a Missing Link Between Human Happiness and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-29, February.
    18. David Victorson & Gretchen Doninger & Scott Victorson & Gwen Victorson & Lars Hall & Carly Maletich & Bradley R. Corr & Kathy Scortino & Zachary Burns & Lori Allen & Ian Rosa & Kelley Quirk & Adekunle, 2021. "Psychosocial and Biological Outcomes of Immersive, Mindfulness-Based Treks in Nature for Groups of Young Adults and Caregivers Affected by Cancer: Results from a Single Arm Program Evaluation from 201," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Álvaro Enríquez-de-Salamanca, 2021. "The impact of quad tourism: a preventive action for the Mediterranean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9454-9476, June.
    20. Marion Porcherie & Nyan Linn & Anne Roué Le Gall & Marie-Florence Thomas & Emmanuelle Faure & Stéphane Rican & Jean Simos & Nicola Cantoreggi & Zoé Vaillant & Linda Cambon & Jean-Philippe Regnaux, 2021. "Relationship between Urban Green Spaces and Cancer: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4753-:d:1090803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.