IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2482-d1051734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Security and Driving Factors of the Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Yanxia Wu

    (College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shuaishuai Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Fangnan Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Yuxuan Cao

    (College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Mingyue Jiang

    (College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin have always been seriously restricted by its unreasonable economic structure and low level of innovation. A two-dimensional indicator system was constructed to evaluate the security of the innovative ecosystem in the Yellow River Basin and identify its driving factors. The R clustering, the method of coefficient of variation, and the entropy method were used to screen and empower the indicators, and then the Lotka–Volterra symbiotic coupling model was introduced innovatively to calculate the security index and analyze its spatio-temporal evolution. Finally, the fixed-effect regression model and Granger causality test were used to identify the driving factors. It was found that (1) The security of the innovative ecosystem in the Yellow River Basin from 2012 to 2021 showed an overall upward tendency, but it was still at a low level, and the innovative landscape community lagged behind the innovative biome for a long time; (2) The security status of the innovative ecosystem showed a differential pattern of “high in the east and south, and lower in the west and north”; (3) Innovation transformation ability, innovation consumption capacity, education, and natural ecological environment are crucial driving factors for improving the security level of an innovative ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanxia Wu & Shuaishuai Yang & Fangnan Liu & Yuxuan Cao & Mingyue Jiang, 2023. "The Security and Driving Factors of the Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2482-:d:1051734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan-Ming Chen & Sheng-Yuan Wang & Xiao-Lan Wu & Erivelton Geraldo Nepomuceno, 2022. "Concept Refinement, Factor Symbiosis, and Innovation Activity Efficiency Analysis of Innovation Ecosystem," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-15, April.
    2. Zhongji Yang & Liangqun Qi & Xin Li & Tianxi Wang, 2022. "How Does Successful Catch-Up Occur in Complex Products and Systems from the Innovation Ecosystem Perspective? A Case of China’s High-Speed Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Han-Shen Chen & Wan-Yu Liu & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Eco-Security to Assess Sustainable Development in Liuqiu Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Yin, Yue & Yan, Ming & Zhan, Qiushi, 2022. "Crossing the valley of death: Network structure, government subsidies and innovation diffusion of industrial clusters," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuhong Zhang & Haiqing Hu & Cheng Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Cause Analysis of Innovation Ecosystem Niche Fitness: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haruo Awano & Masaharu Tsujimoto, 2022. "Mechanisms for Business Ecosystem Members to Capture Value through the Strong Network Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Ji Chai & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2017. "Integrated Evaluation of Coupling Coordination for Land Use Change and Ecological Security: A Case Study in Wuhan City of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Mingxin Wen & Ting Zhang & Long Li & Longqian Chen & Sai Hu & Jia Wang & Weiqiang Liu & Yu Zhang & Lina Yuan, 2021. "Assessment of Land Ecological Security and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Chaohu Lake Basin, China from 1998–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Lichun Mo & Jiancheng Chen & Yi Xie, 2021. "Ecological Approach for the Evaluation of Structure and Sustainability in the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Tatiana Farane Mein & André Luiz Veiga Gimenes & Eduardo Mario Dias & Maria Lídia Rebello Pinho Dias Scoton & Miguel Edgar Morales Udaeta, 2021. "Environmental Vulnerability in Pre-Salt Oil and Gas Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Yang, Yitao & Jia, Bin & Yan, Xiao-Yong & Zhi, Danyue & Song, Dongdong & Chen, Yan & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lóránt A. & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Uncovering and modeling the hierarchical organization of urban heavy truck flows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Xiaolan Wu & Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Assessment of Enterprise Life Cycle Based on Two-Stage Logistic Model: Exemplified by China’s Automobile Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Alessandro Muscio & Felice Simonelli & Hien Vu, 2023. "Bridging the valley of death in the EU renewable energy sector: Toward a new energy policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4620-4635, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2482-:d:1051734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.