IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2303-d1048768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinant Factors of Post-Partum Contraception among Women during COVID-19 in West Java Province, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Laili Rahayuwati

    (Department of Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Ikeu Nurhidayah

    (Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Rindang Ekawati

    (National Population and Family Planning Board, Jakarta 13650, Indonesia)

  • Habsyah Saparidah Agustina

    (Department of Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Dadang Suhenda

    (National Population and Family Planning Board, Jakarta 13650, Indonesia)

  • Dean Rosmawati

    (National Population and Family Planning Board, Jakarta 13650, Indonesia)

  • Vira Amelia

    (Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

Background: One of the manifestations of family development is pregnancy planning, where this method is applied 0–42 days after childbirth. Post-partum contraception is an effort to avoid pregnancy by using contraceptive medicine from 42 days to 84 days after childbirth. Purpose: This research aims to analyze the attitudes of fertile couples who use contraceptive devices after childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic and the factors that influence it. Method: This research uses a quantitative method approach. The sampling technique was random sampling with proportional sampling so that 280 respondents were obtained from 3 regencies/cities in West Java with high fertility rates and low post-partum contraceptive participation rates. Quantitative data analysis used univariate, bivariate, and multivariate methods. Result: The results showed that the final model of the analysis of the most determining factors for post-partum contraception during a pandemic were family support, healthcare staff support, counselling with healthcare staff, attitudes, and age at first marriage. Conclusion: Fertile couples with the highest amount of family support are more likely to use post-partum contraceptive devices during COVID-19. The results of this study can be used as material for consideration in making decisions about post-partum contraception, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Laili Rahayuwati & Ikeu Nurhidayah & Rindang Ekawati & Habsyah Saparidah Agustina & Dadang Suhenda & Dean Rosmawati & Vira Amelia, 2023. "Determinant Factors of Post-Partum Contraception among Women during COVID-19 in West Java Province, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2303-:d:1048768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bongaarts, 2015. "Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(19), pages 535-560.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rotimi Felix Afolabi & Martin Enock Palamuleni, 2022. "Influence of Maternal Education on Second Childbirth Interval Among Women in South Africa: Rural-Urban Differential Using Survival Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    2. Jamal Abdul Nasir & Sohail Akhtar & Syed Arif Ahmed Zaidi & Andleeb Rani & Hina Bano & Andrew Hinde, 2019. "Is recent Afghanistan survey data suitable for fertility analysis? A regional investigation based on fertility inhibiting determinants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. David A Sánchez-Páez & José Antonio Ortega, 2019. "Reported patterns of pregnancy termination from Demographic and Health Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Caroline Krafft & Elizabeth Kula & Maia Sieverding, 2021. "An investigation of Jordan’s fertility stall and resumed decline: The role of proximate determinants," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(19), pages 605-652.
    5. Pedzisai Ndagurwa & Clifford Odimegwu, 2019. "Decomposition of Zimbabwe’s stalled fertility change: a two-sex approach to estimating education and employment effects," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 35-63, March.
    6. Roch Millogo & Clémentine Rossier, 2022. "Fertility Transition in Dakar, Nairobi, and Ouagadougou Since the 1970s: An Identical Reduction at All Ages Through Modern Contraception?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(5), pages 2115-2142, October.
    7. Frank Götmark & Malte Andersson, 2023. "Achieving sustainable population: Fertility decline in many developing countries follows modern contraception, not economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1606-1617, June.
    8. Jocelyn E. Finlay & Iván Mejía-Guevara & Yoko Akachi, 2016. "Delayed marriage, contraceptive use, and breastfeeding: Fertility patterns over time and wealth quintiles in sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-43, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Thirunaukarasu Subramaniam & Nanthakumar Loganathan & Erez Yerushalmi & Evelyn Shyamala Devadason & Mazlan Majid, 2018. "Determinants of Infant Mortality in Older ASEAN Economies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 397-415, February.
    10. Dalomi Bahan & Latif Dramani, 2019. "Socioeconomic Status and Fertility Decline in Burkina Faso, 2003-2015," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 56-70, March.
    11. Bruno Arpino & Jordi Gumà & Albert Julià, 2018. "Family histories and the demography of grandparenthood," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(42), pages 1105-1150.
    12. David Antonio Sánchez-Páez & José Antonio Ortega, 2018. "Adolescent contraceptive use and its effects on fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(45), pages 1359-1388.
    13. Yoonjoung Choi & Madeleine Short Fabic & Jacob Adetunji, 2018. "Does age-adjusted measurement of contraceptive use better explain the relationship between fertility and contraception?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(45), pages 1227-1240.
    14. Yoko Akachi & Jocelyn Finlay & Iván Mejía-Guevara, 2016. "Delayed marriage, contraceptive use, and breastfeeding: Fertility patterns over time and wealth quintiles in sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 043, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Canning, David & Mabeu, Marie Christelle & Pongou, Roland, 2020. "Colonial origins and fertility: can the market overcome history?," MPRA Paper 112496, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. John Bongaarts, 2017. "The effect of contraception on fertility: Is sub-Saharan Africa different?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(6), pages 129-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2303-:d:1048768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.