IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p500-d1018042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Procedure for Knee Flexion Angle Estimation Based on Functionally Defined Coordinate Systems and Independent of the Marker Landmarks

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Ancillao

    (Robotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Functional Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Unit, Institute of Engineering Design and Product Development, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Arno Verduyn

    (Robotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Maxim Vochten

    (Robotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Erwin Aertbeliën

    (Robotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Joris De Schutter

    (Robotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Knee angles are kinematic quantities that are commonly presented in gait analysis reports. They are typically calculated as the relative angles between the anatomical coordinate systems rigidly attached to the femur and the tibia. To give these angles a biomechanical meaning, the coordinate systems must be defined with respect to some anatomical landmarks. For example, if one axis of the joint coordinate systems is directed along the knee flexion/extension axis, then the relative angle assumes the meaning of flexion/extension angle. Defining accurate anatomical coordinate systems is not an easy task, because it requires skills in marker placement, landmark identification and definition of a biomechanical model. In this paper, we present a novel method to (i) functionally define two coordinate systems attached to femur and tibia and (ii) functionally calculate the knee angle based on the relative differential kinematics between the previously defined coordinate systems. As the main limitation, this method is unable to provide an absolute measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle; however, it is able to accurately capture and display the relative angular motion of the knee. We show that our method produced consistent results even when the measured coordinate systems were randomly modified, removing any anatomical referencing. The proposed method has the advantage of being independent/invariant of the choice of the original coordinate systems of the femur and tibia, removing the need for accurate marker placement. Some major consequences are that (i) the markers may be placed on optimal landmarks, for example, minimizing the soft tissue artifacts or improving the subject’s comfort, and (ii) there is no need for anatomical calibration when technical marker clusters/triads are used.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Ancillao & Arno Verduyn & Maxim Vochten & Erwin Aertbeliën & Joris De Schutter, 2022. "A Novel Procedure for Knee Flexion Angle Estimation Based on Functionally Defined Coordinate Systems and Independent of the Marker Landmarks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:500-:d:1018042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Federica Camuncoli & Alessia Barbonetti & Luigi Piccinini & Eugenio Di Stanislao & Claudio Corbetta & Gabriele Dell’Orto & Filippo Bertozzi & Manuela Galli, 2022. "Analysis of Running Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Barefoot vs. a New Ankle Foot Orthosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Alon Wolf & Merav Senesh, 2011. "Estimating joint kinematics from skin motion observation: modelling and validation," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(11), pages 939-946.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Molina-Rueda & Pilar Fernández-González & Alicia Cuesta-Gómez & Aikaterini Koutsou & María Carratalá-Tejada & Juan Carlos Miangolarra-Page, 2021. "Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-8, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:500-:d:1018042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.