IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5594-d808585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Adaptive Telemedicine Specialist Recommendation Considering Specialist Activity and Patient Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Lu

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Yunkai Zhai

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for Internet Medical Systems and Applications, Zhengzhou 450052, China)

Abstract

Purpose: With the rapid development of medical informatization, information overload and asymmetry have become major obstacles that limit patients’ ability to find appropriate telemedicine specialists. Although doctor recommendation methods have been proposed, they fail to address data sparsity and cold-start issues, and electronic medical records (EMRs), patient preferences, potential interest of service providers and the changes over time are largely under-explored. Therefore, this study develops a self-adaptive telemedicine specialist recommendation method that incorporates specialist activity and patient utility feedback from the perspective of privacy protection to fill the research gaps. Methods: First, text vectorization, view similarity and probabilistic topic model are used to construct the patient and specialist feature models based on patients’ EMRs and specialists’ long- and short-term knowledge backgrounds, respectively. Second, the recommended specialist candidate set and recommendation index are obtained based on the similarity between patient features. Then, the specialist long-term knowledge feature model is used to update the newly registered specialist recommendation index and the recommended specialist candidate set to overcome the data sparsity and cold-start issues, and the specialist short-term knowledge feature model is adopted to extend the recommended specialist candidate set at the semantic level. Finally, we introduce the specialists’ activity and patients’ perceived utility feedback mechanism to construct a closed-loop adjusted and optimized specialist recommendation method. Results: An empirical study was conducted integrating EMRs of telemedicine patients from the National Telemedicine Center of China and specialists’ profiles and ratings from an online healthcare platform. The proposed method successfully recommended relevant and active telemedicine specialists to the target patient, and increased the recommended opportunities for newly registered specialists to some extent. Conclusions: The proposed method emphasizes the adaptability and acceptability of the recommended results while ensuring their accuracy and relevance. Specialists’ activity and patients’ perceived utility jointly contribute to the acceptability of recommended results, and the recommendation strategy achieves the organic fusion of the two. Several comparative experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and operability of the hybrid recommendation strategy under the premise of data sparsity and privacy protection, enabling effective matching of patients’ demand and service providers’ capabilities, and providing beneficial insights for data-driven telemedicine services.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Lu & Yunkai Zhai, 2022. "Self-Adaptive Telemedicine Specialist Recommendation Considering Specialist Activity and Patient Feedback," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5594-:d:808585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Wei & Hou, Hongli & Ma, Rui & Chen, Haotian & Zhang, Ran & Cui, Fangfang & Zhang, Qian & Gao, Yacong & Wang, Xinpu & Bu, Caihong & Zhao, Jie & Zhai, Yunkai, 2021. "Influencing factors of patient satisfaction in teleconsultation: A cross-sectional study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Martin Wiesner & Daniel Pfeifer, 2014. "Health Recommender Systems: Concepts, Requirements, Technical Basics and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunkai Zhai & Xin Song & Yajun Chen & Wei Lu, 2022. "A Study of Mobile Medical App User Satisfaction Incorporating Theme Analysis and Review Sentiment Tendencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Cai & Fei Yu & Manish Kumar & Roderick Gladney & Javed Mostafa, 2022. "Health Recommender Systems Development, Usage, and Evaluation from 2010 to 2022: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Zhang, Mengdan & Zhang, Chonghui & Shi, Qiule & Zeng, Shouzhen & Balezentis, Tomas, 2022. "Operationalizing the telemedicine platforms through the social network knowledge: An MCDM model based on the CIPFOHW operator," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Chauhan, Ankur & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2022. "Implications for sustainable healthcare operations in embracing telemedicine services during a pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Vanderlei Carneiro Silva & Bartira Gorgulho & Dirce Maria Marchioni & Sheila Maria Alvim & Luana Giatti & Tânia Aparecida de Araujo & Angelica Castilho Alonso & Itamar de Souza Santos & Paulo Andrade , 2022. "Recommender System Based on Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Dietary Advice: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the ELSA-Brasil Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5594-:d:808585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.