IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2831-d760922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can We Actually Change Help-Seeking Behaviour for Mental Health Problems among the General Public? Development of the ‘PLACES’ Model

Author

Listed:
  • June S. L. Brown

    (Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Denmark Hill Campus, Kings College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Stephen Lisk

    (Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Denmark Hill Campus, Kings College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Ben Carter

    (Biostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Denmark Hill Campus, Kings College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Sharon A. M. Stevelink

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Denmark Hill Campus, Kings College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Ryan Van Lieshout

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Daniel Michelson

    (Psychology Department, Sussex University, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK)

Abstract

Good treatment uptake is essential for clinically effective interventions to be fully utilised. Numerous studies have examined barriers to help-seeking for mental health treatment and to a lesser extent, facilitators. However, much of the current research focuses on changing help-seeking attitudes, which often do not lead to changes in behaviour. There is a clear gap in the literature for interventions that successfully change help-seeking behaviour among the general public. This gap is particularly relevant for early intervention. Here we describe the development of a new model which combines facilitators to treatment and an engaging, acceptable intervention for the general public. It is called the ‘ PLACES ’ ( P ublicity, L ay, A cceptable, C onvenient, E ffective, S elf-referral) model of treatment engagement. It is based on theoretical work, as well as empirical research on a low intensity psychoeducational cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention: one-day workshops for stress and depression. In this paper, we describe the development of the model and the results of its use among four different clinical groups (adults experiencing stress, adults experiencing depression, adolescents (age 16–18) experiencing stress, and mothers with postnatal depression). We recorded high rates of uptake by people who have previously not sought help and by racial and ethnic minority groups across all four of these clinical groups. The clinical and research implications and applications of this model are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • June S. L. Brown & Stephen Lisk & Ben Carter & Sharon A. M. Stevelink & Ryan Van Lieshout & Daniel Michelson, 2022. "How Can We Actually Change Help-Seeking Behaviour for Mental Health Problems among the General Public? Development of the ‘PLACES’ Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2831-:d:760922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Joanna K. & Howarth, Emma & Vainre, Maris & Jones, Peter B. & Humphrey, Ayla, 2017. "A scoping literature review of service-level barriers for access and engagement with mental health services for children and young people," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 164-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Minseop & Garcia, Antonio R. & Jung, Nahri & Barnhart, Sheila, 2020. "Rates and predictors of mental health service use among dual system youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Glassgow, Anne Elizabeth & Gerges, Michael & Martin, Molly A. & Estrada, Isela & Issa, Zahra & Lapin, Katerine & Morell, Laura & Solis, Nitza & Van Voorhees, Benjamin & Risser, Heather J., 2018. "Integration of mental health services into an innovative health care delivery model for children with chronic conditions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 144-151.
    3. Nicholas Woodrow & Hannah Fairbrother & Katrina D’Apice & Katie Breheny & Patricia Albers & Clare Mills & Sarah Tebbett & Rona Campbell & Frank De Vocht, 2022. "Exploring the Potential of a School-Based Online Health and Wellbeing Screening Tool: Young People’s Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Gevaert, Koen & Keinemans, Sabrina & Roose, Rudi, 2018. "Deciding on priorities in youth care: A systematic literature review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 191-199.
    5. Sapiro, Beth, 2020. "Assessing trustworthiness: Marginalized youth and the central relational paradox in treatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Giordano, Keri & LaTourette, Richard & O'Rourke, Sarah & Baker, Sadaysia & Breen, Emily, 2021. "Availability & willingness of psychologists to treat infants and young children: Data from one state," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Rachel Moran & Leslie Morrison Gutman, 2021. "Mental health training to improve communication with children and adolescents: A process evaluation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 415-432, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2831-:d:760922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.