IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2196-d749958.html

Investigation of Eating Disorder Risk and Body Image Dissatisfaction among Female Competitive Cheerleaders

Author

Listed:
  • Allison B. Smith

    (School of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70507, USA)

  • Jennifer L. Gay

    (Department of Health Promotion & Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Eva V. Monsma

    (Department of Physical Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Shawn M. Arent

    (Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Mark A. Sarzynski

    (Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Dawn M. Emerson

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science, and Athletic Training, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Toni M. Torres-McGehee

    (Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

Abstract

Social agents associated with cheerleading environments are increasingly linked to body image dissatisfaction (BID) and eating disorders (ED). This study examined ED risk across team type, squad type, and position. An additional purpose determined BID in clothing type (daily clothing, midriff uniform, and full uniform), and meta-perceptions from the perspective of peers (MP peers), parents (MP parents), and coaches (MP coaches). Female cheerleaders ( n = 268) completed an online survey which included demographics, the Eating Attitudes Test-26, and pathogenic behavior questions. Body image perceptions were assessed by using the Sex-Specific Figural Stimuli Silhouettes. Overall, 34.4% of cheerleaders ( n = 268; mean age: 17.9 ± 2.7 years) exhibited an ED risk. Compared to All-Star cheerleaders, college cheerleaders demonstrated significant higher ED risk ( p = 0.021), dieting subscale scores ( p = 0.045), and laxative, diet pill, and diuretic use ( p = 0.008). Co-ed teams compared to all-girl teams revealed higher means for the total EAT-26 ( p = 0.018) and oral control subscale ( p = 0.002). The BID in clothing type revealed that cheerleaders wanted to be the smallest in the midriff option ( p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.332). The BID from meta-perception revealed that cheerleaders felt that their coaches wanted them to be the smallest ( p < 0.001, η2 = 0.106). Cheerleaders are at risk for EDs and BID at any level. Regarding the midriff uniform, MP from the perspective of coaches showed the greatest difference between perceived and desired body image.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison B. Smith & Jennifer L. Gay & Eva V. Monsma & Shawn M. Arent & Mark A. Sarzynski & Dawn M. Emerson & Toni M. Torres-McGehee, 2022. "Investigation of Eating Disorder Risk and Body Image Dissatisfaction among Female Competitive Cheerleaders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2196-:d:749958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allison Smith & Dawn Emerson & Zachary Winkelmann & Devin Potter & Toni Torres-McGehee, 2020. "Prevalence of Eating Disorder Risk and Body Image Dissatisfaction among ROTC Cadets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:6:p:1527-1539 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2196-:d:749958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.