IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1772-d742049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Post-Exercise Hemodynamic Response Be Influenced by Different Recovery Methods in Paraplegic Sportsmen?

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe J. Aidar

    (Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão 49100-000, Brazil)

  • Edilson F. Dantas

    (Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão 49100-000, Brazil)

  • Paulo F. Almeida-Neto

    (Department of Physical Education, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil)

  • Frederico R. Neto

    (Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia 71535-005, Brazil)

  • Nuno D. Garrido

    (Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Trás os Montes and Alto Douro University, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Breno G. Cabral

    (Department of Physical Education, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil)

  • Tiago Figueiredo

    (Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Estacio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro 22790-710, Brazil)

  • Victor M. Reis

    (Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Trás os Montes and Alto Douro University, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

Post-exercise hypotension is of great clinical relevance and also in sports training settings, as recovery speed is important. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of different recovery methods on post-exercise hemodynamic response. Twelve male paraplegic sportsmen (25.40 ± 3.30 years) performed a strength training (ST) session using the bench press exercise. After the ST, three recovery methods were randomly performed over a 15-min period: passive recovery (PR), cold-water (CW) and dry needle (DN). Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and myocardial oxygen were measured before and post ST, as well as post the recovery method. Results: Dry needling induced lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) immediately after the treatment when compared with the other recovery methods, but the contrary was observed at 50 and 60-min post recovery, where records with DN exhibit higher mean values (η 2 p = 0.330). There were no differences in post-exercise diastolic BP and mean BP between recovery methods. There was a significantly higher HR after the PR method, when compared with CW and with DN (η 2 p = 0.426). The same was observed for double product and for myocardial oxygen, though with a larger effect size (η 2 p = 0.446). We conclude that dry needling seems to induce a faster SBP lowering immediately after the procedure but at 50-min post procedure the cold-water method showed better result. As for HR, both procedures (DN and CW) showed a better recovery when compared with passive recovery, along the several moments of measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe J. Aidar & Edilson F. Dantas & Paulo F. Almeida-Neto & Frederico R. Neto & Nuno D. Garrido & Breno G. Cabral & Tiago Figueiredo & Victor M. Reis, 2022. "Can Post-Exercise Hemodynamic Response Be Influenced by Different Recovery Methods in Paraplegic Sportsmen?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1772-:d:742049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseane Barbosa de Jesus & Felipe J. Aidar & Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Junior & Jainara Lima Menezes & Ana Filipa Silva & Roberto Carvutto & Luca Poli & Stefania Cataldi & Giulia Messina & Tulio Lu, 2022. "Analysis of Post-Exercise Acute Hemodynamic Sustainability in Different Training Methods in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1772-:d:742049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.