IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1067-d727907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation Effects of Governance and Management of Sacred Natural Sites: Lessons from Vhutanda in the Vhembe Region, Limpopo Province of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule

    (Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

Scholarly discourse on sacred natural sites (SNS) has focused on ecological significance, associated impacts and traditional practices as the instruments of resource governance and management. As a result, little scholarship has examined the role of spirits in governing and managing SNS; these are inhabited by deities or numina , commonly known as nature spirits. This study aims to provide evidence of the importance of governance by spirits as a prerequisite for protecting biophysical resources. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observation. The respondents were selected through a purposive sampling approach. The author also attended a funeral that was held at one of the SNS discussed in this article. The collected data were analysed through a thematic content analysis. The study shows that, for biodiversity to be protected, there should be a good relationship between humankind and the spirits. The spirits place behavioural demands on humankind involving the performance of rituals. Ritual behaviour empowers the spirits to be placed as owner of SNS and to guard against intruders. In return, humankind receives blessings, protection, patronage and governance. The governance by spirits is complemented by traditional practices. I conclude that governance by spirits should be recognised both locally and internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule, 2022. "Conservation Effects of Governance and Management of Sacred Natural Sites: Lessons from Vhutanda in the Vhembe Region, Limpopo Province of South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1067-:d:727907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henri Järv & Raymond D. Ward & Janar Raet & Kalev Sepp, 2021. "Socio-Economic Effects of National Park Governance and Management: Lessons from Post-Socialist Era Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-34, November.
    2. M.G. Chandrakanth & Mahadev G. Bhat & M.S. Accavva, 2004. "Socio‐economic changes and sacred groves in South India: Protecting a community‐based resource management institution," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(2), pages 102-111, May.
    3. Jon Geir Petursson & Dadi Mar Kristofersson, 2021. "Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jukka Siltanen & Jon Geir Petursson & David Cook & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2022. "Diversity in Protected Area Governance and Its Implications for Management: An Institutional Analysis of Selected Parks in Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule & Thendo Mugwena & Mulalo Rabumbulu, 2021. "The Conflict between Preserving a ‘Sacred Natural Site’ and Exploiting Nature for Commercial Gain: Evidence from Phiphidi Waterfall in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. James McGinlay & Jens Holtvoeth & Alfie Begley & Juliana Dörstel & Anne Kockelmann & Michael Lammertz & Chrysovalantis Malesios & Nikoleta Jones, 2023. "Perceived Social Impacts of Protected Areas, Their Influence on Local Public Support and Their Distribution across Social Groups: Evidence from the Eifel National Park, Germany, during the COVID-19 Pa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Prashanth Ballullaya, U. & Reshmi, K.S. & Rajesh, T.P. & Manoj, K. & Lowman, Margaret & Allesh Sinu, Palatty, 2019. "Stakeholder motivation for the conservation of sacred groves in south India: An analysis of environmental perceptions of rural and urban neighbourhood communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Bastian Bertzky & Colleen Corrigan & Susan Snyman, 2022. "Planning Effective Conservation Landscapes for Nature and People: An Editorial Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-4, July.
    6. Melvani, Kamal & Myers, the Late Bronwyn & Stacey, Natasha & Bristow, Mila & Crase, Beth & Moles, Jerry, 2022. "Farmers’ values for land, trees and biodiversity underlie agricultural sustainability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Michaël Virgil Bishop & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir & Þorvarður Árnason, 2022. "Tourism, Recreation and Wilderness: Public Perceptions of Conservation and Access in the Central Highland of Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & João C. Azevedo & Pascual Fernández, 2021. "Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Rural Development and Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-3, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1067-:d:727907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.