IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16537-d998245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Application of Three Methods for the Determination of Outdoor PM 2.5 Design Concentrations for Fresh Air Filtration Systems in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Zhang

    (School of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Hao Sun

    (School of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Kaipeng Li

    (School of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xingxin Nie

    (School of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Yuesheng Fan

    (School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Huan Wang

    (School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Jingyao Ma

    (School of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of fresh-air filtration systems, the methods of determining the outdoor PM 2.5 design concentration have become more important. However, the monitoring of atmospheric fine particles in China started relatively late, and there are relatively few cities with complete data, with obvious regional differences, which led to many problems in the selection of air filters for fresh-air filtration systems. In this paper, three methods of determining outdoor PM 2.5 design concentration were analyzed using the daily average concentration of PM 2.5 in 31 provincial capital cities from 2016 to 2020. Six typical cities in different regions were also taken as examples. The advantages and disadvantages of the three existing statistical methods were compared and analyzed, as well as the corresponding differences in the selection of outdoor PM 2.5 concentration value on the filter systems. The results showed that the method of mathematical induction was more accurate and reasonable for the calculation of outdoor PM 2.5 design concentrations. The local outdoor PM 2.5 design concentration could be quickly calculated using the recommended coefficient K and annual average PM 2.5 concentration of the region, especially for small and medium-sized cities without monitoring data. However, the recommended coefficient K should be provided based on the specific region, and should be divided into values for strict conditions and normal conditions during use. This would provide a simple and effective way to select the correct air filters for practical engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Zhang & Hao Sun & Kaipeng Li & Xingxin Nie & Yuesheng Fan & Huan Wang & Jingyao Ma, 2022. "Comparison of the Application of Three Methods for the Determination of Outdoor PM 2.5 Design Concentrations for Fresh Air Filtration Systems in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16537-:d:998245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingqin Wang & Dongye Fan & Li Zhao & Weiwei Wu, 2019. "A Study on the Design Method of Indoor Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Pollution Control in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Chen Li & Le Zhang & Qinyi Gu & Jia Guo & Yi Huang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Urbanization Factors of Urban Household Carbon Emissions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiantian Gu & Shuyu Liu & Xuefan Liu & Yujia Shan & Enyang Hao & Miaomiao Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Smart City and Analysis of Its Spatial–Temporal Characteristics in China: A Case Study of 26 Cities in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Chen Li & Jiaji Wu & Yi Huang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Coupling Characteristics of Rural Elderly Care Institutions in China: Sustainable Human Settlements Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Haiyan Lei & Suiping Zeng & Aihemaiti Namaiti & Jian Zeng, 2023. "The Impacts of Road Traffic on Urban Carbon Emissions and the Corresponding Planning Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Mei Shang & Xinxin Shen & Daoyan Guo, 2024. "Analysis of Green Transformation and Driving Factors of Household Consumption Patterns in China from the Perspective of Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-34, January.
    5. Tiantian Guo & Jidong Wang & Chen Li, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Influencing Mechanism of Tourism Ecological Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Shaoqi Sun & Yuanli Xie & Yunmei Li & Kansheng Yuan & Lifa Hu, 2022. "Analysis of Dynamic Evolution and Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions at County Level along “The Belt and Road”—A Case Study of Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16537-:d:998245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.