IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15979-d988838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Road Less Traveled: How COVID-19 Patients Use Metaphors to Frame Their Lived Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Deng

    (College of Language Intelligence, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing 400031, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jixue Yang

    (School of English Studies, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing 400031, China
    Zengcheng Experimental School of Guangzhou Zhixin Middle School, Guangzhou 511300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Li Wang

    (Science and Education Department, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing 400036, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yaokai Chen

    (Department of Infection Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing 400036, China)

Abstract

Metaphor provides an important intellectual tool for communication about intense disease experiences. The present study aimed to investigate how COVID-19-infected persons metaphorically frame their lived experiences of COVID-19, and how the pandemic impacts on their mental health burden. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 patients afflicted with COVID-19. Metaphor analysis of patient narratives demonstrated that: (1) COVID-19 infection impacted patient conceptualization of themselves and the relationship between the “self” and the body, as well as social relationships. (2) Metaphors relating to physical experience, space and time, and integrative behaviors tended to be used by COVID-19 patients in a negative way, whereas war metaphors, family metaphors, temperature metaphors, and light metaphors were likely to express positive attitudes. (3) Patients preferred to employ conventional metaphors grounded on embodied sensorimotor experiences to conceptualize their extreme emotional experiences. This study has important implications with respect to the therapeutic function of metaphors in clinical communication between healthcare professionals and COVID-19 patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Deng & Jixue Yang & Li Wang & Yaokai Chen, 2022. "The Road Less Traveled: How COVID-19 Patients Use Metaphors to Frame Their Lived Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15979-:d:988838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Deng & Huimin Li & Minjun Park, 2022. "Emotional Experiences of COVID-19 Patients in China: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Alvisa Palese & Maddalena Peghin & Valentina Bressan & Margherita Venturini & Valentina Gerussi & Giulia Bontempo & Elena Graziano & Erica Visintini & Carlo Tascini, 2022. "One Word to Describe My Experience as a COVID-19 Survivor Six Months after Its Onset: Findings of a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Roberta Lynn Woodgate & Pauline Tennent & Nicole Legras, 2021. "Understanding Youth’s Lived Experience of Anxiety through Metaphors: A Qualitative, Arts-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ann Dadich & Katherine M. Boydell & Stephanie Habak & Chloe Watfern, 2021. "Positive Organisational Arts-Based Youth Scholarship: Redressing Discourse on Danger, Disquiet, and Distress during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Katherine M. Boydell & Michael Hodgins, 2021. "Special Issue on “Qualitative Inquiry in Mental Health Research with Young People”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-4, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15979-:d:988838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.