IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15945-d988418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Managers’ Environmental Cognition on Urban Public Service Innovation from the Perspective of Green Ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Liu

    (School of Tourism, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

  • Yuanyuan Zhou

    (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
    School of Business, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

Abstract

With the continuous improvement in urban managers’ cognition of green ecology, it is a hot issue in current research to explore the role of managers’ cognition on urban public service innovation from the perspective of green ecology. The main purpose of this study was to explore ways to build green ecological cities and provide high-quality urban public services based on managers’ environmental cognition. Through sorting out and discriminating the concepts related to green ecology, this research improves the current theoretical system related to green ecological city services. A theoretical model of a green ecological city public service system was constructed, and its influence path and effect on green ecological city public service innovation were analyzed in detail. This research provides a good tool and method for follow-up research to better understand the composition and innovation of green ecological city public service systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Liu & Yuanyuan Zhou, 2022. "The Impact of Managers’ Environmental Cognition on Urban Public Service Innovation from the Perspective of Green Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15945-:d:988418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Qiuyue & Gao, Da & Song, Deyong & Li, Yi, 2021. "Environmental regulation, pollution reduction and green innovation: The case of the Chinese Water Ecological Civilization City Pilot policy," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
    2. Laurini, Robert, 2021. "A primer of knowledge management for smart city governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahman Peyravi & Kęstutis Peleckis & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2023. "Eco-Innovation Performance of Lithuania in the Context of European Environmental Policy: Eco-Innovation Indicators and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Shusen Zhu & Hui Sun & Beibei Zhang & Zedong Yang & Xuechao Xia, 2023. "Bilateral Effects of ESG Responsibility Fulfillment of Industrial Companies on Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhice Cheng & Xinyuan Chen & Huwei Wen, 2022. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Han Zhu & Aili Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Water Resource Tax Reform on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17630-17648, December.
    3. Yansong Zhang & Yujie Wei & Yu Mao, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment of Regional Water Resources in China Based on DPSIR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Xinwen Lin & Angathevar Baskaran & Yajie Zhang, 2023. "Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation Policy and Green Ecological City Development: Spatial and Mechanism Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Wenge, 2022. "Water-use technical efficiency and income: Evidence from China's South-North Water Transfer Project," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Jinzhi Tong & Youyou Yang & Chunhua Zheng & Minglan Zheng, 2024. "Do Fiscal Incentives Contribute to Pollution Control? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Jing Xu & Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou & Yunxiao Kong, 2021. "Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Industrial Transformation: An Empirical Study Based on City Function in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Lianju Lyu & Daxue Kan & Wenqing Yao & Weichiao Huang, 2022. "Has China’s Pilot Policy of Water Ecological Civilization City Construction Reduced Water Pollution Intensity?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Chaoyang Tu & Zhenyu Chen & Yasir Habib & Zheng Peng, 2023. "The Efficiency of Rural Public Finance Inputs in Promoting Rural Revitalization: Empirical Analysis Based on Henan Province, China," Review of Economic Assessment, Anser Press, vol. 2(1), pages 73-86, April.
    10. Liu, Yijun & Xu, Rong, 2024. "Money talks: How financial constraint influence corporate environmental behavior prioritization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 556-578.
    11. Katarzyna Gadomska‐Lila & Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2024. "The importance of green competencies in advancing organizational sustainability: The empirical perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1152-1169, February.
    12. Doojin Ryu & Jengei Hong & Hyunjae Jo, 2024. "Capturing locational effects: application of the K-means clustering algorithm," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(1), pages 265-289, June.
    13. Žofčinová Vladimíra & Čajková Andrea & Král Rastislav, 2022. "Local Leader and the Labour Law Position in the Context of the Smart City Concept through the Optics of the EU," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 3-26, May.
    14. Dou Xiangsheng & Ishaq Fizza, 2023. "Regional Environment Risk Assessment Over Space and Time: A Case of China," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19.
    15. Liang Li & Yanghong Wang & Meixuen Tan & Huaping Sun & Bangzhu Zhu, 2023. "Effect of Environmental Regulation on Energy-Intensive Enterprises’ Green Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Mingxing Li & Xinxing Wang & Zihao Wang & Babar Maqbool & Abid Hussain & Waris Ali Khan, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation Based on CiteSpace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Yang, Shubo & Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib, 2023. "How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Chengfeng Yu & Jiyu Yu & Da Gao, 2024. "Smart Cities and Greener Futures: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China’s Smart City Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Wanli Zhang & Bin Zhu & Yongling Li & Dan Yan, 2024. "Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: a multi-country meta-analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Lihua Li & Chengdao Huang & Weijuan Li & Zhuxia Wei, 2022. "Booster or Stumbling Block? The Role of Environmental Regulation in the Coupling Path of Regional Innovation under the Porter Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15945-:d:988418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.